Effectiveness. That the innovation has been commissioned or
chartered after June 30, 1996, and thus sufficient time has passed to demonstrate the
initiatives effectiveness. Particular attention will be paid to costs of
implementation, savings and other related benefits.
Innovation. That in the Jurys experience, the entry
is genuinely innovative within the public sector. Innovation may take the form of a
successful experiment; the implementation of effective organisational change; the
translation of new ideas into practice; or harnessing new technology. Where innovation
involves technological change, the emphasis will be on how the technology was introduced
into the organisation.
Relevance. That the innovation is consistent with the
Awards theme and that it is relevant. The impetus for the change and the purpose and
objectives of the change should be noted.
Significance. That the benefits of the innovation, either
actual or potential, are significant; note: significance can be local as well as national
and will not be evaluated simply on the grounds of the size and scale of benefits.
Replicability. The submission has or will be replicated in
some shape or form by other governments or agencies. If so, it should be noted by whom and
the level of success to date.
Appropriateness to Context. Given regional economic and
socio-economic conditions, particular technologies may be more appropriate to the
situation or context (i.e. capital financing versus labour intensive improvements).