|
Innovation Journal > News >
Old News
- OREDI Newsletter - September 2, 2002
- Focus Public Management Newsletter of the OECD - June 2002
- OREDI Newsletter - August 1, 2002
- Call for Papers - Public Policy
- OREDI Newsletter - July 15, 2002
- Public Voices
- Whitehall employees are the unhappiest in Britain
- Study finds Canada tops in e-government services
- Human Resources Development Canada Project Management Network
- Canada’s Innovation Strategy
- Congratulations, Mohamed!
- June Edition of ESD Clearinghouse
- Citizens First 2000
- Book Review: J.M. Roberts, "Twentieth Century"
- Innovation in Government Workplaces
- Announcement/New Edition: Probity; March 6, 2001
- European Commission proposes a new framework programme for research and innovation in Europe
- The Hospital of the Future. Conference and Call for Paper
- Government of Canada Appoints a Senior Visiting Fellow on Knowledge Creation and Innovation
- Anne Mueller 1930-2000: Innovation Against Odds
- Office of the E-Envoy
- Valuable E-Government Resource Now On-line
- The Ultimate Model Of Citizenship
- What US Government Employees Think, Results of the 1999 Survey
- National Research Council Canada Communiqué, Roundtable 2000
- 1999 Best Book
- International Institute for Public Ethics Year 2000 Conference
- Exploring the Changing Boundaries of Governance:A New Australian Institute
- Public Management Conference Papers
- Canadian Federal Public Service Employee Survey 1999: First of Its Kind in the World
- Mexican Managerial Reform: Overview and Future Steps
- News About Knowledge
- Utah Daily Stops the Presses and Goes Electronic with Colorado Brings the Net Into the Courtroom
- Creating an Innovation Culture: Key Challenges and Opportunities as Ontario Moves Ahead in the New Millennium
- International Institute for Public Ethics Year 2000 Conference
- Guidelines for Electronic Scholarship
- International Public Management Networkers
- Gary Hamel's New Mantra: Innovation
- Information, Incentives and Commitment: An Empirical Analysis of Contracts between Government and State Enterprises
- The Knowledge Ecology Network (KEN)
- Some interesting ideas on innovation
- Re-launch of Public Administration, an international quarterly
- 2000 Dubai Award: Call for Best Practices
- Glossary of Concepts and Listserv "Globe-L" on Globalization
- A Report of the Special Parliamentary Committee for the Future, Part 2: Skill and Faira PlayAn Active and Responsible Finland
- Interesting information from the Canadian Centre for Management Development (French Version)
- Risk Assessment
- Response re Definition of Innovation
- European Journal of Innovation Management
- Volkswagen Foundation - Transformation of Economic/Political/Social Systems
- Websites on environment and environmental aspects of the economy
- Announcing the Launch of a New Journal
- Call for Proposals for Drucker Course
- Global Knowledge Innovation Infrastructure
- Mapping Social Cohesion
- Government of Canada Departmental Performance Reports
- The Impact of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Report on Finland's Future
- Two Virtual Symposia
- Education Indicators in Canada
- Ontario Public Sector Quality Fair
- Public Service Excellence Model
- Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
- Midwest Division of the Academy of Management
- The Great Search for Canadian Futurists
- The Economics of Public Spending: Debts, Deficits and Economic Performance
Ontario's Regional Economic Development and Innovation Newsletter,
September 2nd, 2002
ANNOUNCEMENTS
- Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency requests proposals for Round II of
the Atlantic Innovation Fund
EDITOR'S PICK
Industry Clusters in Southern Arizona: 2001 Status Report
INNOVATION & RELATED POLICY
- Global Strategy and the Acquisition of Local Knowledge: How MNCs Enter
Regional Knowledge Clusters
- Comparing the Innovation Performance of Canadian Firms and those of
Selected European Countries: An Econometric Analysis
REGIONAL INNOVATION & CLUSTERS
- The Declustering of America
KNOWLEDGE & UNIVERSITIES
- Public Knowledge, Private Property and the Economics of High-Tech
Consortia
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- The U.S. Broadband Problem
- Assessing the Economic Impacts of ICT
EVENTS
- BayBYTEs 2002 - Rural Technology Forum: Reaping the Rewards from Working
in Rural Communities
Access the website.
From: Focus Public Management Newsletter of the OECD,
June 2002 Number 24
Project e-government
To promote and co-ordinate the transition to
e-government across all levels of government in Denmark, the
government has launched "Project E-Government", which involves
state, regional and local administrations (see Focus No. 23, p. 2).
The e-government vision formulated in the strategy is to systematically
use digital technologies to introduce new ways of thinking and to
transform organisation and work processes, and thus improve efficiency and
service. Project E-Government works with biannual project portfolios that
are selected so as to maximise the impact of e-government in the public
sector. The projects fall into two main categories:
• Resolving the general technical and
legal issues that impede the development of e-government, e.g. initiatives
to promote the diffusion of digital signatures as the basis
HELP at the tobacconists
HELP is the Austrian
government’s portal to public administration information for
citizens on the Internet, channelling citizens to information on various
life events such as childbirth, marriage, purchase of motor vehicles,
housing, etc. Since February
2001,
Austrian tobacconists and
HELP have
co-operated to create "Trafiknet", making the benefits of
HELP available
to those citizens who do not have individual access to the Internet.
Access at the tobacconists has the advantage of long opening hours,
proximity to customers, and high customer frequency. See http://www.help.gv.at.
government-business relations, government-citizen relations, labour market
activation, sickness benefits administration, electronic services to
families, geographical data sharing, hospital-nursing home co-operation,
immigration, occupational accident administration, car registration,
agricultural regulation, and welfare benefits administration. Among other
things, the work has led to a portal with joined-up services where
businesses in the future will be able to solve most of their dealings with
government. See http://www.e.gov.dk/.
Contact:
Danish Ministry of
Finance
Elisabeth Hvas, Head of Department
Tel. +45-33.92.38.60
E-mail: ehv@fm.dk
or
Kristian Thorn, Head of Section
Tel. +45-33.92.26.66
E-mail: krt@fm.dk
Institute for Innovation
The Portuguese Institute for Innovation in State
Administration (IISA) was created in late 2001 to take the place of
several existing state bodies, including the Secretariat for
Administrative Modernisation. Its main objectives are to:
• Promote, co-ordinate
and evaluate innovation in public policy in the state
administration;
• Decentralise the implementation of
innovation policies;
• Increase service transparency and
proximity to citizens;
• Encourage management by results.
It is structured around
four activity centres: technological innovation and quality; development
of models and organisational innovation; civil service management; and
database management and methodological development.
Innovation and modernisation group
A small reform unit – the Innovation and
Modernisation Group – has been established in the Ministry of Labour and
Government Administration in Norway to assist the Minister, who has
responsibility for encouraging, supervising and coordinating the reform
effort in the public sector. The Group’s mission is to provide guidance,
help facilitate reform processes across sectors, and contribute to an
effective general communications strategy on modernisation efforts.
Principles and reform efforts include:
• Simplifying and
reducing the number of public regulations, e.g. setting an automatic
expiration date for certain regulations.
• Reviewing and re-organising state
supervisory authorities.
• Increasing freedom of choice of service
providers, e.g. through the use of vouchers.
• Requiring public service providers to
carry out systematic user surveys.
• Requiring estimates of total costs,
including user costs for public tenders, investments and major
re-organisations of service provision.
• Increasing delegation and
decentralisation of authority and responsibility to local service
providers.
• Allowing for greater competition between
public and private service providers on the local level.
• Improving efficiency in the business
sector by implementing an action plan to improve market competition.
Contact
Svein Berbu
Innovation and Modernisation Group
Ministry of Labour and Government Administration
Tel +47-22-24.49.68
E-mail: svein.berbu@aad.dep.no
Central responsibility for hospitals
On 1 January 2002, responsibility for all public
hospitals was transferred to the central government in Norway.
These hospitals are to be operated as health enterprises and will be
wholly owned by central government. The two main elements of the reform
are: • Responsibility for the
hospitals is transferred to a single owner: the central government. •
The hospitals are organized as enterprises;
they are separate legal subjects and thus not an integral part of the
central government administration. The central government will determine
the principal health policy objectives and frameworks, which will form the
basis for management of the enterprises. The reform also includes most
county municipal specialist health services – both physical and
psychiatric health care – and the ambulance service.
Contact:
Vivi Lassen
Tel.+47-22-45.12.72
Fax: +47-22-46.94.70
Email: vivi.lassen@statskonsult.dep.no
Ontario's Regional Economic Development and Innovation Newsletter,
August 1st, 2002
The August 1st issue of the The OREDI newsletter is now
available at:
http://www.utoronto.ca/onris/newsletterlink43.htm
CONTENTS
ANNOUNCEMENTS
- New Brunswick restructures economic development agencies as
"Enterprise
Network"
- Half of U.S R&D Concentrated in Six U.S. States
EDITOR'S PICK
- Measuring Third Stream Activities
INNOVATION & RELATED POLICY
- Tuning the SR&ED Tax Incentive Program: Ideas for the ICT Sector
- Assessing the Socio-Economic Impacts of the Framework Programme
REGIONAL INNOVATION & CLUSTERS
- Governor's Guides to economic policies
- Smart Growth at the Frontier: Strategies and Resources for Rural
Communities
UNIVERSITIES & KNOWLEDGE
- Measuring Competence And Knowledge Using Employee Surveys: Evidence Using
The
British Skills Survey Of 1997
NEW EVENTS
- Doing Business in the New European Economy
Call for papers!
Invitation to submit An Abstract for Public Policy and Public Management in a Globalized World: Policy Learning and Policy Emulation across Countries and Regions
By David Levi-Faur and Eran Vigoda (Editors)
General description
Modern societies are going global and in this process are redefining the
boundaries between the domestic and the external. In a shrinking world
policy lessons are increasingly drawn on cross-national basis rather than on
specific national experience and are less and less constrained by cultural
and geopolitical boundaries. The know-how of other nations is increasingly
conceived as essential and relevant for the economic competitiveness of
nations and for the welfare of the citizens. Epistemic communities,
international organizations and policy entrepreneurs thus transfer it to the
domestic economic, political and social settings that are often radically
different from the originating setting. The benefits, costs and implications
of these policy transfers are the subject of this book. Specialists in
public policy, public administration and public management join-force
together to explore the role of policy learning in the promotion of more
reflective and efficient public policies across the world. In doing so they
aim to advance our knowledge on the new conditions of management,
administration and policy in a global world.
While knowledge, technology and ideology were always highly susceptible to
transfer from one nation to another, we are said to face policy transfers
that are ever more intense and extensive. The trend is increasingly
documented and reflected in the literature of the social sciences in large
and the political science in particular. Itb is also a subject to extensive
debate. On the one side stand proponents of globalization who advocate
increase cross-national policy learning (and convergence) and perceive it as
a great promise for the advance of management techniques, administrative
controls and policy effectiveness. On the other side stands the critics of
globalization that identify emulation, manipulation and coercion as the
major forces that propel the changes that are widely evident across
countries and policy spheres.
Thus, this debate touches on the meaning of policy learning, its origins, on
the necessary and sufficient conditions that propel it, on the autonomy and
motives of the agent that promote it, as well as on the institutional and
other constraints over the implementations of imported-ideas in different
context. In the context of this debate where everything is questionable this
volumes is trying to deal with several prime questions of policy and
management in a global world. (1) What are the political preconditions for
cross-national policy learning? (2) What re the mechanism and agencies that
are responsible for cross-national policy learning? (3) To what extent and
under which conditions does cross-national policy learning lead to better
public performances? (4) What are the cultural and institutional constraints
on cross-national policy learning and how these constraints vary across
state? And finally (5) which fields or arenas of policy making are more
prone to globalization and extensive diffusion of policy transfers and what
are the implications of these variations on worldwide policy implementation?
Contacts
If you are interested in contributing your work for this book please send an
abstract directly to the Editors. Abstracts should be received no later than
November 1, 2002. All submissions should be done electronically (use e-mail
attachment files in MS Word format). Acceptance is subject to a double blind
review process by an ad-hoc editorial board. Note that we have limited
ourselves to a small number of chapters that are best written and best
respond to the book's topic. Some of the papers will also be published in a
special issue of the International Journal of Public Administration.
David Levi-Faur
Center for European Politics, Economics and Society
University of Oxford
3 George Street Mews
OXFORD, OX1 2AA
United Kingdom
Telephone: 44- (0) 1865 278701
Fax: 44- (0) 1865 278725
Email: david.levi-faur@socstud.ox.ac.uk
Eran Vigoda
Head of Graduate Program in Local Government Administration (MLGA)
Department of Political Science The University of Haifa Haifa, 31905
ISRAEL
Telephone: 972-(0)4-8240709
Fax: 972-(0)4-8257785
Email: eranv@poli.haifa.ac.il.
Ontario's Regional Economic Development and Innovation Newsletter,
July 15th, 2002
The July 15th issue of the OREDI Newsletter is now available
for viewing at
http://www.utoronto.ca/onris/newsletterlink42.htm.
CONTENT SUMMARY:
ANNOUNCEMENTS
- New Technology Guide Identifies 290 Tech Companies in Waterloo region
EDITOR'S PICK
- Why Cities Matter: Policy Research Perspectives for Canada
INNOVATION & RELATED POLICY
- Innovation Analysis Bulletin - Vol. 4, No. 2
- Innovation Is a Social Process
- A Comparison of Business Costs in North America, Europe, and Japan: G7 -
2002 Edition
- Innovation in America: Federal Lab R&D Roundtable
REGIONAL INNOVATION & CLUSTERS
- The BHI State Competitiveness Index 2001
- Preparing for the Next Silicon Valley: Opportunities and Choices
UNIVERSITIES & KNOWLEDGE
- The University in the Learning Economy
- Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson & Winter: a mixed record
- The Production of Knowledge in Canada: Consolidation and Diversification
NEW EVENTS
- Softworld 2002
Public Voices is a unique journal that focuses on humanistic, artistic
and
reflective expressions concerning public administrators and the public
service.
For volume VI, Public Voices seeks unorthodox, controversial
perspectives.
Submissions may include original fiction, poetry, review of novels and films
and insights based on observation and research, etc.
Prof. Marc Holzer, Editor
ncpp@andromeda.rutgers.edu
Whitehall employees are the unhappiest in Britain
By Charlotte Denny and Larry Elliott
Monday October 23, 2000
The Guardian
Research carried out for the government has revealed that its own
employees are the most demoralised group of workers in the country.
Twenty years of cost-cutting and constant change have left Britain's army
of Whitehall civil servants the most demoralised group of workers in the UK,
the survey shows.
Central government employees are the least likely to look forward to
going to work when they wake up in the morning, the least likely to be proud
to tell other people who they work for, and have the weakest sense of
loyalty towards their employers.
Only one in seven say they trust senior management.
The embarrassing findings, which the Cabinet Office tried to water down,
are revealed in research carried out by the Chartered Institute of Personnel
and Development for the government's in-house civil service training centre.
Its findings, to be published on Wednesday, suggest that the prime
minister's pledge to modernise British government could be threatened by
discontented civil servants.
The head of the civil service, Sir Richard Butler, said it provided a
welcome insight into what staff in Whitehall think. "But we accept
fully that there is a lot more work to be done."
Privately however, sources say the Cabinet Office was dismayed by the
negative picture of Whitehall workers emerging from the research, for which
it provided 15% of the funding. Senior
officials at the Cabinet Office asked the institute to play down the
morale problem in its presentation of the report, fearing ministers could
use it as a stick with which to beat the civil service.
Continuous Whitehall restructuring is to blame for the low morale,
according to the institute. "Over the last two decades central
government has enjoyed a plethora of initiatives designed to extend the
operation of business disciplines and practices within the public
sector," said Mike Emmott of the CIPD. "Such change clearly does
not come without a cost."
Low morale comes despite civil servants enjoying more job security than
any other group of workers and the most flexible working arrangements. More
than half believe they are not fairly paid for the work they do compared
with a third of private sector workers.
Within central government, more employees now work for private
sector_style agencies than for traditional departments of state. But there
is no evidence from the study that the move away from rigid Whitehall
hierarchies to the more decentralised style of working in agencies makes
their staff any happier.
"Public servants feel that the public service ethos to which they
are committed is undervalued when compared with the emphasis on commercial
imperatives and imported management practices," said Geoff Armstrong,
the CIPD's director. Whitehall workers feel let down by senior
managers, who they say make promises they fail to keep. "It is clear
from our report that employees in central government are not yet convinced
that management is keeping its side of the bargain," Mr Armstrong said.
The findings pose a big challenge to senior management and the
government, which launched a programme to modernise the civil service last
year. This promised a better deal for staff and new, non-bureaucratic ways
of working.
The Cabinet Office said yesterday: "Obviously some people aren't
satisfied with their lot. If anything this research confirms the need for
the [reform] programme. We are committed to making the civil service a
better place to work."
The CIPD interviewed 2,000 workers from private firms, the health
service, and central and local government. Health workers were the most
contented group, followed by private sector workers.
Available from The
Guardian/Observer Archive
Study finds Canada tops in e-government services
The Globe and Mail newspaper reported on April 24, 2002 that
Canada is the top provider of electronic government services for the second
consecutive year. In an international study by the consulting firm
Accenture, Canada edged out Singapore and the United States as the best
supplier of on-line services among twenty-three countries assessed. Ottawa
was singled out in particular for providing well-integrated on-line services
that put citizens’ needs first, offering means for giving feedback, and
for having at least four areas from which Canadians can apply for employment
insurance over the Internet. The third annual study of its kind highlighted
the Canadian government’s strong leadership, focus on a
whole-of-government approach, and commitment to innovation driven by
citizens’ and businesses’ needs. Canada moved from fourth in the initial
study to first in the last two studies. While Canada is in the forefront,
the study noted that there is still a long way to go.
Source: Simon Tuck, "Study finds Canada tops in e-government
services," The Globe and Mail, April 24, 2002, page B7.
Related resources: See Service
Delivery
Human Resources Development Canada
Project Management Network
HRDC
Project Management Network
By: Kearie Daniel
Over the years, studies have shown networking to be one of the most
useful life skills to acquire. For
many, networking skills are invaluable tools contributing to career
advancement, learning opportunities or having a well-balanced life.
Line Gauthier, understands this. In
fact, she understands so well that in June 2001, working on her own time,
Gauthier created an initiative for HRDC employees, she called PMN (the
HRDC Project Management Network). This network aims to create
opportunities and to stimulate ongoing communication among staff, within
and outside their branches through networking and sharing of tools and
information related to project management skills and issues.
“Everywhere people are busy and there is a natural
tendency to work in silos” says Gauthier. “In a structured but
informal way, the Project Management Network offers opportunities to get
communication flowing outside the silos.”
Creating a Workplace of Choice and Supporting Our People are commitments
that Line Gauthier supports wholeheartedly. She believes that sharing information, opportunities and
invitations are empowering to staff. “They receive invitations to take
advantage of a variety of opportunities that may interest them.”
The NCR Calendar of events aims to be very dynamic. The network has
frequent short and informal meetings over lunch hour or early in the
morning, often with subject matter experts as guest speakers. Some of the themes explored so far have dealt with Project
Management Tools, Lessons Learned, Best Practices, Knowledge Management,
Communications, Team Dynamics, and Workload Management.
One of the initiatives within the network, enjoying significant success,
is a special Mutual Mentoring program. “The formal mentor/mentee
relationships are never easy to set up yet I was determined to develop
mentoring opportunities,” says Gauthier. “This January, the Project
Management Network piloted a 10-week Mutual Mentoring program where
participants, in their four-member teams, take turns in their dual roles
of mentee and mentor. They
get the opportunity to mutually benefit from each other’s experience in
a structured setting.”
“It is very satisfying to meet people everyday who tell me how much
they appreciate participating or getting various information and
invitations to PMN events and initiatives. Sometimes they tell me how a
particular presentation or contact helped them in their job,” Gauthier
says, “even when they’re often too busy to participate, they see the
invitations as perks. It’s very rewarding for me and it makes it all
worthwhile.”
Line concludes by saying “I’d like members to see the Project
Management Network as a forum for creating their own opportunities by
taking a leadership role in the areas of their choice.”
For more information on how to get involved in the HRDC Project
Management Network or to be added to the mailing list, please contact Line
at line.gauthier@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca or by phone at: 1-819-994-7947.
HRDC Project Management Network
<<
The dynamic forum providing informal networking and knowledge transfer
opportunities for all HRDC staff involved in project management. >>
MISSION
: The HRDC
Project Management Network provides opportunities for informal
cross-functional networking and knowledge transfer for all HRDC staff
involved at any level in the project management process.
MEMBERSHIP
: This
Network is for the benefit of all HRDC staff, from novice to expert,
involved at any level in a project management process (IT and non-IT). As of February 15, 2002, there were a total of 935 members (672 in
NCR) and the numbers are growing.
OBJECTIVES
: The main objectives are to :
- interact
with colleagues of interdisciplinary project management backgrounds;
- create a
calendar of frequent meetings in local networks across the country;
- foster
buddying, coaching and mentoring opportunities;
- increase
awareness and use of available resources, services, references, tools,
lessons learned, best practices related to project management; and,
- be a
cross-roads of partnering with the many related organizations.
ACTIVITIES
: Regular
bulletins are disseminated nationally with project management related
exchanges of information. Local
meetings are organized to offer informal networking and knowledge transfer
opportunities. Main
areas of focus include : 1) Project Management information sharing, 2)
Knowledge Management / Knowledge Transfer, and 3) Mentoring / Coaching. In very concrete ways, we plan to stimulate awareness and
discussion, as well as encourage the use of various existing tools and
resources. Paramount
importance will continue to be given to networking with the groups who
have the formal mandates for Project Management, for Knowledge Management
and for implementing Mentoring initiatives.
MENTORING :
In
January 2002, the NCR Project Management Network launched a pilot
mentoring initiative based on small mutual mentoring focus groups. The concept of mutual mentoring or coaching seeks to capitalize on
the value of each participant’s diverse strengths and areas of
expertise. The dynamics of the small teams results in each participant
benefiting from the experience of wearing both the mentee and mentor hats.
CONTACT US : For
sharing or requesting more information, please contact line.gauthier@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
or at (819) 994-7947.
We
have desktop access to expert advisors… The Leadership Network invites
us to an online interactive virtual network where Project Management has
been identified as one of the network communities. We can benefit from asking questions and seeking advice, or
contributing as a virtual mentor or coach.
Canada's Innovation Strategy is presented in two papers. Both focus
on what Canada must do to ensure equality and opportunity and economic
innovation on the knowledge society.
Achieving
Excellence: Investing in People, Knowledge and Opportunity
recognizes the need to consider knowledge as a strategic national asset.
It focuses on how to strengthen science and research capacity and on how
to ensure that this knowledge contributes to building an innovative
economy that benefits all Canadians.
Knowledge
Matters: Skills and Learning for Canadians recognizes that a
country's greatest resource in the knowledge society is its people. It
looks at what can be done to strengthen learning in Canada, to develop
people's talent and to provide opportunity for all to contribute to and
benefit from the new economy.
Innovation
Strategies in the United Kingdom, Australia, United States, and Sweden
Mohamed Charih, member of The Innovation Journal Editorial Board,
was honoured
by Ecole nationale d'administration publique with its first Prix d'Excellence en
recherche on November 9, 2001. Congratulations, Mohamed.
Just a short note to let you know that the June edition of the ESD
Clearinghouse has just been published. We have received lots
of new ideas
and leads in the last month, thank you. Your views are always welcomed. Find
it at http://www.ipaciapc.ca/esd.
Patrice A. Dutil
Director of Research (pdutil@ipaciapc.ca)
The Institute of Public Administration of Canada has just published a ground
breaking study on government service delivery entitled Citizens
First 2000.
IPAC, together with the Senior Service Delivery Officials Forum,
commissioned Erin Research to conduct a groundbreaking survey of the
opinions of Canadians regarding government services. The study was
sponsored by all the provinces, the Yukon Territory, the Federal Government
and the cities of Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.
The survey was randomly sent to approximately 60,000 households in Canada.
The final report reflects the views of all people and regions across the
country regarding the services they receive from government. You will find a
press release, a summary report and the full report at:
http://www.ipaciapc.ca/english/new/citizens.htm
Patrice A. Dutil
Director of Research (pdutil@ipaciapc.ca)
Book Review: J. M. Roberts, "Twentieth Century: The History of the World, 1901 to 2000"
In its September issue, FUTURECASTS online
magazine - at
www.futurecasts.com - presents a Book Review:
J. M. Roberts, "Twentieth
Century: The History of the World, 1901 to 2000," a formidable effort to sketch
the many influences and trends that have shaped the world we live in and the
directions in which it is currently heading. History opens windows on the
future.
Also in the September issue, FUTURECASTS continues its "Authoritative Myths"
series with "The Myths We Live By: Economic and Political Myths that have
MIsguided Policy," highlighting the danger of such myths when they actually
succeed in being adopted as guides to policy. Reality perversely refuses to
conform to ideological expectations.
In the October issue, FUTURECASTS will present a Book Review: Robert
Conquest: "Reflections on a Ravaged Century," accentuating the negatives of a
20th century history that had all too many of them.
Regards,
Dan Blatt, Publisher,
FUTURECASTS online magazine,
www.futurecasts.com
dblatt@rsvlonline.net
Innovation in Government Workplaces"The incidence of flexible job designs in the government sector is triple that
reported for the private sector in Canada." That's just one conclusion to be found in "Changing Government Workplaces", a
new report from CPRN by Anil Verma and Zsuzsanna Lonti of the Centre for Industrial
Relations at the University of Toronto. It speaks to the evident change underway in the
public sector. This paper is one in the series of reports completed for the Work Network's Human
Resources in Government project . Project funders include the governments of Alberta,
Manitoba, Nova Scotia, Ontario, three federal agencies - Human Resources Development, the
Public Service Commission and the Treasury Board Secretariat - and the Public Service
Alliance of Canada. The report is based on the Survey of Workplace Issues in Government (SWIG) carried out
in the above jurisdictions as well as five in-depth case studies. It provides, for the
first time, systematic empirical evidence on the extent of change in workplace practices
in government. That evidence points to significant transformation. The authors conclude that many of the changes in public sector workplaces are driven by
external pressures such as budget constraints, public accountability pressures and
shifting government priorities. These have led to adoption of such practices as
performance measurement, divestiture of service functions and concentration of knowledge
work, flexible job designs and a greater emphasis on training and employee involvement. These changes, many claim, have lead to enhanced quality and productivity (though these
are often difficult to measure). At the same time, the changes have lead to fewer jobs,
but jobs that are better paid and that may need enhanced, or completely new, skills. You can access or download the complete report by clicking here: http://www.cprn.org/cprn.html
Announcement/New Edition: Probity
March 6, 2001The 13th Edition (March-April/2001) of the Spanish language
anti-corruption journal, Probity, (Revista Probidad), is now online: http://www.probidad.org.sv/revista This edition includes 14 essays written by 9 anti-corruption
analysts and practitioners from Latin America. It includes summaries of investigations and
surveys; descriptions of new anti-corruption software and government and non-profit
anti-corruption initiatives; and discussions of ethics, values, corruption scandals and
anti-corruption proposals. The Table of Contents, which includes a brief summary of each
essay, is included below our signatures. We hope this new edition of Probity, like those that precede it, is
a useful tool that enhances understanding about corruption in Latin America and will
contribute to
new anti-corrupción strategies that are more indigenous and thus, effective. While the journal is in Spanish, we hope you can benefit from it and
will visit the Probidad web site: http://www.probidad.org.sv.
It contains an English section
which describes our history, objectives, actors, and local and regional activities. Jaime López
Linda Hemby
Co-editores
Revista Probidad
URL: www.probidad.org.sv
Correo: contacto@probidad.org.sv
European Commission proposes a new framework programme for research and innovation in EuropeBrussels, 21 February 2001 Proposals for a new research and innovation framework programme for
the European Union have been presented today by the European Commission, on the initiative
of Research Commissioner Philippe Busquin. "Europe has set out to become the most
successful and competitive knowledge-based economy in the world. Research and innovation
are the keys to success in achieving this goal," said Commissioner Busquin. Reflecting the increased priority given to research and innovation,
the Commission is proposing a budget of Euro17.5 billion for the new programme. This
budget, covering the four-year period 2003-2006, represents an increase of 17% over the
budget of the current research framework programme. The research and innovation programme
is part of a wider political initiative aiming at creating a European Research Area, as
endorsed by the Lisbon Summit in March 2000. The new programme is one of the major actions
in the strategy paper the Commission has put forward for the Stockholm Summit on 23-24
March. Commissioner Busquin added, "In this new programme, I am
putting forward proposals to help businesses develop the key technologies for the future,
and for our universities and research centres to work closer together to strengthen
Europe's science base." As outlined in the European Research Area initiative, research in
Europe's universities and businesses is currently hampered by a number of constraints:
projects often do not have enough critical mass to compete on a worldwide scale; research
efforts are fragmented; and Europe is still not attracting excellent scientists back to
work here. The new programme would address these problems by concentrating funding on a
limited number of key priorities for Europe; helping research teams work more closely
together in networks; and improving the mobility of researchers and the attractiveness of
Europe as a home for world-class research. Special emphasis is given to initiatives helping to open up European
research to the rest of the world. Seven key emerging technologies and research priorities are
proposed:
- Genomics and biotechnology for health: the objective is to build on the recent breakthrough in decoding the genome to help tackle major diseases and strengthen Europe's biotechnology industry
- Information society technologies: the objective is to develop the key information technologies to strengthen Europe's industry and help people throughout Europe benefit from the development of the knowledge-based society
- Nanotechnologies, intelligent materials, new production methods: the objective is to help Europe's industry benefit from leading-edge technologies for the knowledge- and intelligence-based products, services and manufacturing processes of the future.
- Aeronautics and space: the objective is to build on recent successes to help maintain Europe's leading edge in the aerospace sector and provide further benefits for safety and environmental protection
- Food safety and health risks: the objective is to establish the scientific base needed for producing safe and healthy food and to control the risks related to food and environmental changes
- Sustainable development and global change: the objective is to strengthen the scientific and technological capacity needed for Europe to be able to implement sustainable development and make a significant contribution to the international efforts to understand and control global change
- Citizens and governance in European society: the objective is to mobilise research capacity in economic, political, social and human sciences to help understand and address issues related to the emergence of the knowledge-based society across our different cultures in Europe
A specific part of the budget is proposed for research to help
improve the design of public policies at a European level the anticipation of scientific
and technological needs of the Union. This includes, for example, research on fisheries, as well as
particular aspects of transport and energy policy, environment policy and other matters
dealt with by the European Union. It also includes an allocation for research at the very
frontiers of science and technology. In addition to these priorities, special measures are proposed for
SMEs, innovation, mobility of researchers and the networking of national initiatives. For SMEs, the current framework programme has set a target
participation of 10%. In the new programme, this objective is increased to 15%. On innovation, the whole thrust of the new programme is designed to
help businesses and researchers exploit the results of research and help translate these
into new investment and jobs. Special measures include help in fields such as intellectual
property rights, access to risk capital and finding partners in other Member States. The highly successful mobility programme will be doubled in size.
The objective is to improve mobility of researchers within Europe as well as to make
Europe more attractive for world-class researchers. More
information
Government of Canada Appoints a Senior Visiting Fellow on Knowledge Creation and InnovationJocelyne Bourgon, the President of the Canadian Centre for
Management Development, and Frank Claydon, Secretary of the Treasury Board Secretariat, are pleased to announce the appointment of a Senior Visiting Fellow on
Knowledge Creation and Innovation. Dawn Nicholson-O'Brien will assume this new role, effective November
21st, 2000, for a period of two years. Building on related work that Dawn led with the Corporate Renewal
and Knowledge Management Office, during the last 2¾ years at the TBS, and her doctoral
studies in this area, the Senior Fellow will develop advanced seminars for federal
executives in areas such as:
- The new science and technology of the 21st century
- The bioeconomy and the DNA for a new revolution
- New leaders and leadership models emerging from the transformation of the workplace and societies worldwide
- An economy of innovation versus replication.
Mrs. Nicholson-O'Brien has also agreed to publish a book for the
Government of Canada on "Canada's Leadership in the Connected Economy".
This will examine the major public policy issues arising from the knowledge-based economy,
Canada's leadership, and what is uniquely Canadian that we need to preserve and foster in
order to liberate human potential and to improve human well-being. The Deputy Minister Committee on Learning and Development, in their
June 2000 report, "A Public Service Learning Organization" recommended that a
Learning Innovation Seed Fund be established. The objective is to encourage innovation and
experimentation, and to sponsor the development and piloting of new ideas for service
delivery, use of technology, policy development or leadership in the Public Service. The Senior Fellow will establish this seed fund, working with Deputy
Ministers and key partners federally, with a view to creating new knowledge, experimental
laboratories and the mental space for applying new practices in key business and
leadership areas. This is a strategic investment internally that is not dissimilar to the
investments made to create research centres of excellence and the Canada Foundation for
Innovation, for the benefit of Canadians. Dawn brings 20 years of experience, knowledge and human networks to
this new role, drawn from previous responsibilities in seven different departments and
agencies, in a variety of roles at the DG and officer level, in the policy, program and
communications communities. The office will be located in the TBS.
The university of Twente and Illinois Institute of Technology are pleased to announce
the forthcoming Conference: THE HOSPITAL OF THE FUTURE. Please see details and Call for papers in the link below: http://www.sms.utwente.nl/beheer/webpage/viewmain.asp?objectID=1502
Anne Mueller 1930-2000 : Innovation Against OddsAnne Mueller, who died this August aged 70, was the first British
woman to reach Permanent Secretary level in a key central Civil Service management job.
She headed the UKs Management and Personnel Office from 1984-1988. A pioneer for her
gender and her generation, she died in August 2000 after suffering from Parkinsons
Disease for many years. Born in Bombay in 1930 to a German businessman father and an English
mother, her family moved to Slovenia and then to England where she was being educated. She
studied PPE at Somerville College Oxford and joined the civil service in 1953, rising
through the ranks within the various departments dealing with industry. In 1956 she
suffered a serious car-crash while based at OECD and always walked with a stick
afterwards. She joined Cabinet Office as Second Permanent Secretary in 1984, heading the
Management and Personnel Office (MPO), which was the slightly truncated remnant of the
Civil Service Department after the latters abolition (matters of pay had gone to
Treasury). The remaining department had a focus on the matters its title indicated. A short anecdote. As a new entrant at Grade 7 Principal
level to her department I received in 1986 a note as did many of us to say that
Miss Mueller (as she was invariably known) wished to address all of her Grade 7s in GOGGS,
the inelegant title of the Government Offices, Great George Street, just at the back of
the Treasury. She did so with an energising mixture of passion and precision. A short
woman, who walked with a stick, the result of a car crash in her 20s, her face was
nonetheless youthful and determined. I recall she urged us all to read the latest
management text-books from America, including one by people called Peters and Waterman on
"excellence". It was the first cuckoo of what was to become a veritable dawn (or
all-day) chorus of management theory that lasted the decade and more. She called on us all
to maintain the ethos of the service, to raise the standard of our work. Nothing terribly
exciting about that, except that one had the forcible impression of a personality who knew
what she wanted. Soon after that I invited her to speak to one of my training groups of
young fast streamers on the course Parliament, Government and the Civil Service.
Her job was to indicate how the culture was changing and to be a role-model. Having read,
as she recommended, the Peters and Waterman book, I courageously decided to entitle her
session "Sticking to Your Knitting" after a chapter-heading in the book. The
argument in the text was that organisations should focus on core tasks and not broaden
their remit Levis should not make suits. She agreed to come, but I think only the
day before she was due to appear her office rang to indicate that "Miss Mueller was
not entirely happy about the title". A woman Perm. Sec being associated with knitting
the clear implication. Oh dear. When she turned up she was professional and cool. Only as
she left did I nerve myself to apologise for the unintended slight of the title. She gave
me the "long, penetrating gaze" that her obituarist Colette Bowe refers to. I do
not believe now she cared less but perhaps she slightly enjoyed the thought that I
might have been very nervous that she did. Moral never take the words of senior
staff too seriously, nor academic slogans either.
Change
Anne Mueller led the drive to change patterns of work and to equalise
the chances of women in the UK system. For her, managing and personnel were both key
tasks, and neither should be reduced by forgetting its link with the other. "The Most Successful Woman Civil Servant of her Generation"
(the title of her Obituary) is fair. She became Dame Anne in 1988. I am sure that there is
a text to be written on "The Miss X Generation" of British public service women
born in the 1930s, now entirely retired, who might have chosen not to marry either because
of the "marriage bar" or because children were an irreducible barrier to a
career until the 1980s. The car crash at Fontainebleu in 1956 left her damaged, but it did
not stop her infusing a spirit of innovation into the often nerveless bureaucratic life. Michael Duggett
London 19 October 2000 Dr Michael Duggett is Principal Lecturer at the Civil Service College, now a
directorate of the Centre for Management and Policy Studies within Cabinet Office, UK. He
is also a member of the editorial board of The Innovation Journal. These are his personal
views.
Michael Duggett The UK has created a new office, headed by a dynamic official who was once John Major's
and Tony Blair's private secretary, Alex Allan (well-known as a fan of the Grateful Dead).
This office, reporting directly to the Prime Minister is to lead the drive to get the UK
on-line. Its head has Permanent Secretary status and works in Cabinet Office alongside its
ministers. It has three teams, dealing with:
e-Commerce
e-Government
e-Communications.
The last has replaced the now-defunct Central IT Unit. In relation to e-Government the unit, headed by Ann Steward, is aimed at making the UK
Government "A global exemplar in the use of the new technologies". There is a
Prime-Ministerial target that by 2002 25% of dealings with the public should be capable of
being done electronically, as set out in the Modernising Government White Paper of March
1999. Dr Michael Duggett is Principal Lecturer at the Civil Service College, now a
directorate of the Centre for Management and Policy Studies within Cabinet Office, UK. He
is also a member of the editorial board of The Innovation Journal. These are his personal
views.
RELEASED: March 16, 2000 (Ottawa) - The Electronic Service Delivery (ESD) Clearinghouse is now on-line. This
one-stop shop provides a direct link to the best new research, case studies, policies and
tools in electronic service delivery today. Born as a project of the Public Service Chief Information Officers Council (PSCIOC) and
developed by the Institute On Governance (IOG), the ESD Clearinghouse provides a unique
opportunity for resource sharing and collaboration across governments and jurisdictions. The Clearinghouse is available on-line in the IOG's existing web site for governance
issues, Policity.com (http://www.policity.com/esd),
where it is sure to become an essential tool for program managers developing ESD in any
department. Last year's PSCIOC Lac Carling Congress-an annual conference bringing together the
banks, municipal, provincial and federal governments and the IT vendor community to
establish "best practices" for e-government-recognized the importance of ESD in
today's public service and sparked the idea for the Clearinghouse. People no longer want to wait in line for service at government offices. They expect
service that fits with their busy schedules, is easy-to-use and available any time of day.
If government managers want to produce the best service delivery for their programs, they
have to become aware of the resources, policies and research available to guide them. The PSCIOC saw the importance of resource sharing across jurisdictions and approached
the Institute On Governance to develop a web site showcasing initiatives and information
from across the country. After several months of design and planning the ESD Clearinghouse
is now on-line. Content is updated regularly, and currently includes resources from the
federal and provincial governments, the United States, Australia, Singapore, United
Kingdom and some Canadian municipalities. For more information contact: Jennifer McCarthy
Media Relations
Institute On Governance
Phone: (613) 562-0092, ext. 230
Fax: (613) 562-0097
E-mail: jmccarthy@iog.ca BACKGROUND Public Service CIO Council (PSCIOC) http://www.pscioc-cdpisp.org
The PSCIOC's mission is to enhance service delivery to the Canadian public through
collaboration across governments and demonstrated leadership in the management of
information and technology. Made up of one CIO for each federal, provincial and territorial jurisdiction (and one
municipal representative), this group of highly skilled and respected professionals
provides leadership and initiates co-operative ventures on a variety of IT/IM issues. The Council provides an excellent forum for the exchange of information and best
practices, and promotes open communication between members and their peers. Institute On Governance (IOG) http://www.iog.ca The Institute On Governance is a non-profit organization with charitable status founded
in 1990 to promote effective governance. We provide advice to public organizations on
governance matters, and bring people together in a variety of settings to promote learning
and debate. Our work in Canada and abroad is focused on creating, sharing and applying
knowledge around governance issues. Current activities fall within six research themes:
- citizen participation
- Aboriginal governance
- building policy capacity
- accountability and performance measurement
- governance and the web
- youth and governance
Policity.com http://www.policity.com In November 1999, the Institute On Governance launched a new Internet site,
policity.com -a collaborative, non-partisan site dedicated to promoting citizen-centred
governance. Through partnerships with public and private organizations, policity supports
the active participation of citizens in resolving public concerns, shaping government
policy, and ensuring citizens' needs are central to program design and service delivery. It is designed for people to interact, test their ideas and become part of an
international network on governance issues. Currently, policity includes the following
resources:
- Public Library, a continually expanding collection of current literature on governance issues and practices, including the ESD Clearinghouse;
- Toolshed, access to practical tools and state-of-the-art methods for citizen participation and electronic service delivery;
- Worksites, "virtual workspaces", either open or private, custom-designed to facilitate consultation and develop ideas or projects over time and distance;
- Notice Board, where visitors can post information on conferences, workshops, jobs and internships, or any comments and questions they wish to share.
Robert Theobald:
by Stephen Silha
Featured Article
Published on Monday, March 13, 2000 in the Christian Science Monitor Every once in a while, you read a book that shakes your world. In 1970, a friend gave
me Robert Theobald's An Alternative Future for America, and I was never the same
after that. The book suggested we were headed for disaster - police state, environmental
meltdown, economic disparity - unless we created a different future: one in which
exponential growth in material things wasn't the primary goal. And more. Submitted by Steve Kurtz
Full-Time Civilian Workforce: 1,391,669
Employees Sent Surveys: 32,265
Employee Response Rate: 40%
Statistical Validity of 1999 Survey Results Data: +/- 2% WHY WE LISTEN TO EMPLOYEES:
- Federal employees are key to getting results Americans care about.
- We need to understand what employees require to be effective in their jobs. The Employee Survey provides insights into what works well and what needs to improve.
- To attract and retain the talent we need now and in the future, we must take action to make the Federal work place better.
WHAT EMPLOYEES TOLD US: Reinvention is making a difference in the work place. The survey shows that 84% of
employees who believe reinvention is a priority where they work are satisfied with their
jobs. This is considerably higher than the 60% government-wide employee satisfaction rate.
And the job satisfaction rate is very low -- 31% -- for employees who do not think
reinvention is a priority in their organizations. Overall job satisfaction in the Federal government (60%) is about the same as in the
private sector (62%). However, government employees give lower ratings to their
supervisors and to the quality of the work produced in their units than private sector
employees do. The Federal government is a family-friendly place to work where differences among
individuals are respected. Employees believe their supervisors support their family and
personal life responsibilities, and several described how the government's family-friendly
policies have helped them deal with family crises. Federal employees now recognize that customer service is part of their jobs. Three out
of four employees (72%) say they know their agencies have customer service goals. More cooperation between labor and management is still needed. Only one in three
employees think management and unions work cooperatively on mutual problems. Both managers
and union representatives expressed concern that lack of trust between sides is a major
barrier to progress. Federal employees want good performers to be rewarded fairly and for poor performance
to be addressed. Employees expressed the greatest dissatisfaction with how employee
performance is handled. Two out of three employees believe rewards are based on something
other than merit; many cited bias and favoritism. Still more employees say that no action
is taken against poor performers; many pleaded strongly for something to be done about
this problem. More information: http://www.employeesurvey.gov/
Roundtable 2000:
Canada's leading Regional Innovation gathering adds to Record of Achievement (Ottawa, April 19, 2000) -- The Ottawa Regional Innovation Roundtable today is adding
to its impressive record with announcements and discussions that reinforce its reputation
for identifying trends and producing action. Roundtable 2000 is the fifth such gathering
of leaders from government, industry, research, and education organized by the Ottawa
Regional Innovation Forum. This year's event, co-sponsored by the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and
the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), is being held today at the Chateau Laurier
Hotel in Ottawa. The featured speakers include government leaders such as the Honourable
Mike Harris, Premier of the Province of Ontario, the Honourable Jim Wilson, Ontario
Minister of Energy, Science and Technology and local community and industry leaders such
as Claude Bennett, Chair of the Ottawa Transition Board, Kirk Mandy, President and CEO of
Mitel Corporation and Dr. Arthur Carty, President of the National Research Council of
Canada. "Silicon Valley North in the Ottawa area is one of the few true high-tech clusters
in Canada," said Minister Wilson in stressing the importance of this event. "And
the high-tech industries that are growing here are creating good, lasting jobs that help
to recession-proof the economy. Two-thirds of all our new jobs are in high-tech
industries, and these industries play a major role in turning the brain drain into a brain
gain for Ontario." The Roundtable, organized by the Ottawa Regional Innovation Forum and the NRC Regional
Innovation Centre, is an annual meeting of close to 200 innovation leaders who have
established an outstanding track record for spotting innovation trends and promoting
collaborative programs in response. "Through its innovative programs to attack the skill shortages in the high tech
industry, its successful efforts to promote changes in tax and immigration policies, and
its call for new alliances within and beyond the high tech sector, the Roundtable has
provided leadership that has had an impact across Canada," said NRC President and
Forum Co-Chair Arthur J. Carty. "NRC is proud of its role in the Roundtable and in
bringing its benefits to other parts of Canada." Previous Roundtables have focused on specific issues facing the information technology
and telecommunications sector, and linking this sector with biotechnology, environmental
technologies, and other high tech sectors. Last year the Roundtable called on participants
to build bridges between high-tech and other sectors such as tourism, arts, culture, and
services. Dr. Carty announced today that NRC, the National Arts Centre of Canada (NAC),
the Canada Council for the Arts (CCA), and other partners are collaborating on a number of
projects to meet this commitment including plans for a major collaborative conference,
Creativity 2000, to be held at the NAC on June 21, 2000. The Regional Innovation Forum was also a major force in promoting the need for changes
in tax policies as they relate to Stock Options and Rollover provisions for re-investment
in small high-tech companies. These changes were announced in this year's federal budget
and were widely praised by the high-tech community. The theme of Roundtable 2000, "Fostering Innovation in Canadian Enterprises",
focuses on ways to encourage an innovation-oriented culture within companies and
organizations. Discussions and workshops will consider incentives for innovation,
marketing, and other issues related to the culture and values of firms. The Regional Innovation Awards ceremony is another first for this year's Roundtable.
The Awards honour outstanding innovators and innovations and seek to stimulate the climate
for innovation in the region. The Award Categories include the Ottawa Citizen Year
2000 Innovator of the Year, the Mitel Year 2000 Innovation of the Year, and the National
Research Council Year 2000 Lifetime Achievement Award for Innovation. The Regional
Innovation Awards will also be hosted by CBC's Steve Smith (Red Green of the Red Green
Show) and will commence at 6:30 P.M. following the Roundtable. For further information, please contact: Arvind Chhatbar
Executive Director,
Regional Innovation Forum
(613) 990-9550 Shannon Cassidy
Media Relations, NRC
(613) 998-7352 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA / APRIL 2000
The Public and Nonprofit Division (PNP) of the Academy of Management is soliciting
nominations for its annual "Best Book Award." The winning author(s) will be
honored at the annual meeting in Toronto, Aug. 4-9 (award ceremony probably Monday, Aug.
7). Nominations should be forwarded to Professor Nancy Roberts at the Naval Postgraduate
School. Details are in the forwarded messages, below. International issues and perspectives are
increasingly important in PNP's domain, so we wholeheartedly welcome submissions with an
international focus. Nominated books must have a 1999 publication date. Additionally, we encourage you to
consider participating in future activities of the division. One preconference roundtable
with an international focus has been organized, and the division has received several
interesting submissions with an international perspective for the regular, competitive
program. Details of the conference and the Academy can be found at: http://www.aom.pace.edu/ In addition, the Public and Nonprofit Division has a formative website, still being
revised, at: http://www.gvsu.edu/spna/aom/ Thanks for your interest. We hope to see you in Toronto in August. Ralph S. Brower
Membership Committee and PDW Co-Chair
PNP Division
Academy of Management Request for Nominations for Best Book Award Dear Colleagues: The Best Book Committee requests your nominations for the Public and Nonprofit Division
s 1999 Best Book award. The initial request in the Fall resulted in a limited number of
nominations. This follow-up is being sent to urge you to forward the names of notable
works that you believe merit consideration for this award. The books nominated should
address issues within the Division s domain of interest. Author membership in the Division is not a criterion for nomination nor selection.
Authors whose books are nominated can be members of the Division or those outside the
Division and the Academy. The winner will be announced during the Academy Meeting in 2000. The basic elements of the form for nomination are included below. Please return
this form, or its equivalent through mail, email, fax, or phone call to: Professor Nancy Roberts
Naval Postgraduate School
555 Dyer Road
Monterey, California 93943
nroberts@nps.navy.mil
831-656-2742 (Phone)
831-656-3407 (FAX) NOMINATIONS Book(s): Reason for Nomination(s):
International Institute for Public Ethics Year 2000 ConferenceNext year the Congress Centre in downtown Ottawa will be the location of a major
international conference on public ethics. The Conference will be held on September 24-28,
2000, with the theme "Ethics in the New Millennium - Bridging the Gap Between Private
and Public Sectors". The Ottawa Conference follows on directly from earlier
conferences sponsored by the Ethics in Public Service Network (EPS), but will be the first
under the aegis of the International Institute for Public Ethics (IIPE). Previous Conferences A series of international conferences looking at public sector ethics have been held
every other year since 1988. The first was in Jerusalem, Israel (1988), followed by
Sienna, Italy (1990), Jerusalem, Israel (1992), Stockholm, Sweden (1994), Brisbane,
Australia (1996) and, most recently, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1998). Ottawa, Canada, was
selected as the site for the Year 2000 Conference during the Netherlands Conference. Conference Focus Participants will share their views on the central challenges of ethics programs, from
the perspective of both state-of-the-art theory and the most effective practices.
Experience will be drawn from a variety of academic, government, business and
non-governmental organizations from around the world. A truly comprehensive program will
offer new insights to both public and private sector delegates. Many activities will take place over the four days, including plenary and group
discussions, luminary panels, workshops, the presentation of papers, and, of course,
several social events where we expect to have a number of distinguished speakers. The
topics to be covered include : Managing for Integrity (the Common Ground between the
Public and Private Sectors); Implementing Ethics Programs; Ethics and the Public Sector
for the New Millennium - The International Perspective. An impressive array of contributors from key posts in government, university,
non-governmental organizations, multinational corporations, and the media, will ensure
this conference is intellectually stimulating and makes a positive impact on the
discipline. In particular, the views of political and business leaders will complement the
insights provided by academics and ethics practitioners. Call for Papers and Workshop Proposals The Program Committee is accepting proposals for papers for panel discussions or
workshops until March 31, 2000. These are to be presented in 45 minute sessions, with
papers being driven more by the presenter with some subsequent discussion, and the
workshops being more interactive and activity-oriented. Presentations may be made in
either English or French, with some key presentations having simultaneous translation.
Abstracts should be sent to Jane McVeigh at and should be no longer than 150 words,
double-spaced, in French or English. For More Information The Conference web site is well worth a visit - it gives more detailed information than
that provided above, and is clearly presented and easy to navigate. It provides useful
links, such as those to other upcoming conferences of a similar nature. The web site
address is:
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/Ethics2000Ottawa.
Should you wish to contact the Conference organizers for more information, the e-mail
address is: For a sense of what's going on in Ottawa, www.ottawastart.com,
and www.ottawakiosk.com are both useful sites.
Exploring the Changing Boundaries of Governance:
A New Australian InstituteEffective and progressive societies in today's increasingly complex world are said to
be characterised by "good governance" and an important new debate is emerging
about what this means in practice. Recent international analysis suggests that the relationships between the public,
private and community sectors of society, and the effectiveness of institutions which
mediate these relationships, are the heart of good governance. Globalization and technological forces, a more competitive market place and changing
government regulatory requirements are some of the factors contributing to new challenges
in governance. Public, private and community organisations are increasingly being
confronted with the need to make changes to their activities and processes so that they
can more effectively meet their goals and better serve their stakeholders. The National Institute for Governance, based at the University of Canberra, is setting
up a network to address governance concerns of contemporary importance. In line with the
discourse on governance issues in Australia and internationally, the Institute's approach
is based on a broad definition of "governance" encompassing the "exercise
of political, economic and administrative authority to manage a nation's affairs" and
including the complex system of institutions, systems and processes which engage the
state, civil society and the private sector in a democratic and transparent way"
(United Nations Development Programme: "Reconceptualising Governance",
Discussion Paper No. 2, January 1997). For the first year of its activities, the Institute has chosen to focus on those issues
that arise at the interface of the interests of the public, private and community sectors
and on how these sectors engage with individual citizens. The public sector, in an
increasingly contestable environment, has to deal differently with the private and
community sectors, especially in devolving service delivery. The private sector,
especially major corporations, is now subject to stock exchange and legislative
requirements of corporate governance which affect its relationships with shareholders and
the public as good and accountable citizens. And community organisations have to deal with
both public and private sectors in new ways which subject them to commercial and
management pressures. Common to the three sectors are internal governance issues such as
accountability, transparency, ethical, participatory, efficiency issues as well as issues
around information management and analysis and availability. On 7 April 2000 the National Institute will host a conference in Canberra, Public &
Private Sector Governance in Australia: Exploring the Changing Boundaries, with the aim of
bringing researchers and practitioners together across the sectors to discuss governance
issues which arise at the interface of the interests of the public, private and community
sectors and which are of current interest. in Australia. Issues expected to be opened up
by key speakers and discussed in open forum include: How are the changing boundaries of
governance perceived? What are the governance implications of convergence of public and
private sector activities and where might the limits be to that convergence? Is the
community benefiting? How does accountability and public interest fit in? Is the new
interface between government and the community in the delivery of services working? How is
the scope and range of economic regulation changing the relationship between the private
sector and the community? Can we yet tell whether contracting-out and regulation of the
private sector has led to more or less efficiency? What is the future outlook for these
issues? The Institute also plans to have appended to this conference a symposium for
post-graduate students to exchange ideas on their research projects in these fields. You can find out more about and join the National Institute for Governance by visiting
our website (http://governance.canberra.edu.au)
or by contacting the Institute by phone (02 6201 5607, +61 2 6201 5607 for international
calls), fax (02 6201 5608, +61 2 6201 5608 for international calls) or email (nigov@management.canberra.edu.au). We look forward to hearing from you. Kind regards, Professor Meredith Edwards
Director
National Institute for Governance
& Deputy Vice-Chancellor
University of Canberra ACT 2601
Australia
Phone: +61 (0)2 6201 5061
Fax: +61 (0)2 6201 5608
Email: mae@management.canberra.edu.au http://governance.canberra.edu.au
Papers presented at the 5th National (US) Public Management Conference are posted,
alphabetically, at http://www-bushschool.tamu.edu/pubman/
Canadian Federal Public Service Employee Survey 1999: First of Its Kind in the World In the spring of 1999 the employer of all Canadian federal government employees, the
Treasury Board of the Government of Canada, conducted the first public service-wide survey
in the world. Conducted by Statistics Canada, the governments statistical agency,
the survey was distributed to more than 190,000 public servants, of whom 104,416 returned
a survey, for a response rate of 55 per cent. The President of APEX, the association of executives of the Government of Canada,
summarized the results as follows:
"Among public servants, there is a strong commitment to the work of public
service, but also a high level of stress and a sense of not having control over the
decisions that immediately affect them, of being over-burdened with secondary work
demands, and of not being fully supported." (APEX Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3,
December 1999, p. 2)
Mexican Managerial Reform:
Overview and Future StepsThe administration of President Zedillo has launched an important project of
administrative reform, perhaps the most (at least formally) ambitious and integral ever:
the "Program for the Public Administration Modernization 1995-2000" (1996). This program inaugurates long forgotten words in Mexican public sector: accountability,
citizen rights, information rights, and evaluation. After a diagnostic, the program
proposes two objectives:
1.- To transform Federal Public Administration into an organization that acts
efficiently and with efficacy through a new culture of service.
2.- To fight against corruption and impunity, through preventing mechanisms and
promoting human resources capacities.
The program proposes four different sub-programs: Citizen Participation and Service,
Administrative Decentralization, Evaluation and Measurement of Public Management, and
Professionalization and Ethics of Public Officers. Several programs and strategies have
been implemented since then. Here we only discuss some of the challenges this program is
facing in terms of two different key categories: accountability and civil service. Accountability: the program enhances in the discourse the question of accountability.
Basically in the presentation and in the diagnostic. However, the subprograms barely refer
to the impact of the actions upon this issue. Citizen participation subprogram actions
refer basically on better information regarding public services, reduction of required
procedures, and the necessity of public agencies on monitoring their "clients".
There is no attempt of requiring a large transformation of the way government controls
information regarding impacts, costs, and budgets assigned to programs or services. There
is no action programmed where "clients" could have real control over the process
and results of the evaluation of the public agency. Decentralization subprogram actions
emphasize the improvement of conditions for the supply of public services and the flexible
capacity that public institutions should have to attend new necessities efficiently. The
apparent assumption is that more accountability would be naturally produced by the better
technical distribution of resources and responsibilities. Accountability is kept as an
internal affair, where efficiency is more important than a wide open system of information
for the public. The subprogram Evaluation and Measurement of the public management actions enunciates
the necessity of developing an integral system of information and new performance
indicators. However, the subprogram proposes these systems for internal control. Better
information to improve internal management, clear objectives and measurable outcomes for
internal evaluation, performance indicators to guide the management decision-making
process. There is no proposal regarding better ways of controlling public actions from
citizens or Congress, for example. No reference of external evaluation of impacts on
society of public programs. The basic emphasis is upon internal management decision-making
process. Civil Service: the subprogram for the Professionalization and Ethic of Public Service
enunciates a long waited mechanism for the implementation of a public service career in
Mexico. However, the program is still very general, inducing all public agencies to define
their procedures for hiring and developing their human resources. Now is 1999, and still
diverse parts of government have been incapable of agreeing in some way to propose a
program for civil service. In addition to these elements, in 1997 a new program for budgeting began to be
implemented. Taking the ministry of Treasury as a base, budget is going to be defined
among public organizations through a definition of outcomes and outputs. These outputs and
outcomes are going to be the principal elements (through the creation of indicators of
performance) to be considered in the future for the definition of budget levels of
different public organizations. It is expected for next year that the System of
Performance Evaluation would be implemented within a sample of public organizations. Here at CIDE we work on innovation analysis in local government. Dr. David Arellano Gault
Director de la División de Administración Pública
CIDE
Director de la Revista Gestión y Política Pública. CIDE
Carretera México Toluca 3655 (km. 16.5) C.P. 01210
DF. México
tel. (52) 57279825,24,23
fax (52) 57279873
arellano@dis1.cide.mx
What is Knowledge Management? For some opinions, see: http://gutenberg.com/~millennium/define.htm
Understanding Intellectual Capital: a dictionary of definitions
http://www.ericsson.se/intellectualcapital/home.htm Knowledge Management Consortium International, Society of Knowledge Management
Professionals: http://kmci.org
- Has created the Innovation Management Society, and an Innovation Metrics
Standard Committee. Contact innovationmetrics@km.org
Atlas of Knowledge Innovation: Beyond Business Planning by Debra M. Amidon and Darius
Mahdjoubi
- Extracts at: www.entovation.com/whatsnew/atlas1.htm
Utah Daily Stops the Presses and Goes ElectronicWith the added declaration that "Clearly, the future of newspapers is on the
Web," the publisher of The Orem Daily Journal announced the Utah daily's final print
edition July 30, adding that the publication begins exclusive online production Aug. 5.
While numerous U.S. weeklies have moved to exclusive Web production, The Journal may be
the first daily to make the leap. The decision may have been prompted in part by a trend
recently published by a Progressive Policy Institute survey that ranked Utah -- at 46% --
fourth nationally in the percentage of residents with Internet access. Journal
Publications intends to cross-promote The Journal and its two remaining paper
publications. Some employees, notably those involved in distribution, are expected to be
laid off as a result of the move. (The Salt Lake Tribune 30 Jul 99) http://www.sltrib.com/ Colorado Brings the Net Into the CourtroomColorado has signed an agreement that could make it the first state in the nation to
let lawyers file lawsuits over the Internet. Electronic filing is available in some
counties in the US, but not in any entire state Colorado signed an agreement with a
software to phase in electronic filing in district courts statewide. Officials say that by the end of next year, if all goes well, lawyers will be able to
push a button on their computer terminals to make filings from their offices, while judges
will have the option of e-mailing orders and decisions instantaneously from their
chambers. The voluntary system will start in November and will expand county by county, with a
statewide system in place by December 2000. Under the system, attorneys can sign up with the software company (JusticeLink) and pay
10 cents a page to make filings over the Internet. The company will process the filing,
then notify the courthouse in Colorado through the Internet. The court clerk then reviews the filing and pushes a button to accept it, and the
system automatically assigns it a case number and a judge. Judges, in turn, can read the
files over the Internet and even e-mail decisions to attorneys, he said. For at least the first year, the courts will make paper copies of files for judges,
attorneys and the public. The state has not decided how the public will have access to filings. The state may
make files available on the Internet with or without a fee. (Associated Press 8/5/99 )
Creating an Innovation Culture: Key Challenges and Opportunities as Ontario Moves Ahead in the New MillenniumPaper prepared for the Ontario Jobs and Investment Board, a blue ribbon panel chaired
by Premier Mike Harris of the Province of Ontario, Canada, looking at ways to spur Ontario
on over the next 5-15 years- including how to generate innovation "on the road to
prosperity".
http://204.101.2.101/jobgrow/papers/innovat.html
International Institute for Public Ethics Year 2000 ConferenceNext year the Congress Centre in downtown Ottawa will be the location of a major
international conference on public ethics. The Conference will be held on September 24-28,
2000, with the theme "Ethics in the New Millennium - Bridging the Gap Between Private
and Public Sectors". The Ottawa Conference follows on directly from earlier
conferences sponsored by the Ethics in Public Service Network (EPS), but will be the first
under the aegis of the International Institute for Public Ethics (IIPE). Previous Conferences A series of international conferences looking at public sector ethics have been held
every other year since 1988. The first was in Jerusalem, Israel (1988), followed by
Sienna, Italy (1990), Jerusalem, Israel (1992), Stockholm, Sweden (1994), Brisbane,
Australia (1996) and, most recently, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1998). Ottawa, Canada, was
selected as the site for the Year 2000 Conference during the Netherlands Conference. Conference Focus Participants will share their views on the central challenges of ethics programs, from
the perspective of both state-of-the-art theory and the most effective practices.
Experience will be drawn from a variety of academic, government, business and
non-governmental organizations from around the world. A truly comprehensive program will
offer new insights to both public and private sector delegates. Many activities will take place over the four days, including plenary and group
discussions, luminary panels, workshops, the presentation of papers, and, of course,
several social events where we expect to have a number of distinguished speakers. The
topics to be covered include : Managing for Integrity (the Common Ground between the
Public and Private Sectors); Implementing Ethics Programs; Ethics and the Public Sector
for the New Millennium - The International Perspective. An impressive array of contributors from key posts in government, university,
non-governmental organizations, multinational corporations, and the media, will ensure
this conference is intellectually stimulating and makes a positive impact on the
discipline. In particular, the views of political and business leaders will complement the
insights provided by academics and ethics practitioners. Call for Papers and Workshop Proposals The Program Committee is accepting proposals for papers for panel discussions or
workshops until March 31, 2000. These are to be presented in 45 minute sessions, with
papers being driven more by the presenter with some subsequent discussion, and the
workshops being more interactive and activity-oriented. Presentations may be made in
either English or French, with some key presentations having simultaneous translation.
Abstracts should be sent to Jane McVeigh at and should be no longer than 150 words,
double-spaced, in French or English. For More Information The Conference web site is well worth a visit - it gives more detailed information than
that provided above, and is clearly presented and easy to navigate. It provides useful
links, such as those to other upcoming conferences of a similar nature. The web site
address is: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/Ethics2000Ottawa.
Should you wish to contact the Conference organizers for more information, the
e-mail address is: For a sense of what's going on in Ottawa, www.ottawastart.com, and www.ottawakiosk.com are both useful sites. Canada's Capital in Autumn For those who have not been to Ottawa in the fall, the stunning colours of the autumn
leaves and the natural beauty of the Ottawa River and Gatineau Hills blends with Ottawa's
many historic buildings to make an unforgettable visual paradise. A major cultural centre,
Canada's capital is home to over 1 million people and has much to see and do, while at the
same time maintaining the intimate feel of a close community in a beautiful natural
setting.
Guidelines for Electronic ScholarshipFrom: Proposed Guidelines on Electronic Scholarship, Information
Technology, and Computer Support in Political Science, September 1, 1999
Ad hoc Committee on Information Technology in Political Science,
American Political Science Association,
at: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~sws/apsa%20guidelines/itguidelines.htm 7. Recognition of contributions by faculty members. Faculty members who develop
computer-based educational applications and scholarly works should be recognized for their
curricula, pedagogical, and scholarly contributions. As part of the performance review
process, whether for annual salary review, tenure, or promotion, experts in IT should
evaluate electronic material where appropriate, as other comparable materials would be,
through external peer review. Departments of political science should develop a written policy concerning the
evaluation of electronic scholarship which includes more than just written material, in
the tenure and promotion process so that faculty members can make decisions about
appropriate ways to distribute their research. In addition, if faculty members are
expected to provide computer support within the department, they should be appropriately
recognized and compensated or rewarded. Political Science departments should develop evaluation procedures that specifically
take into account electronic scholarship. It is generally agreed that scholarship is more
than the discovery of new knowledge. It is also the application, integration, and
dissemination of this new knowledge. This can happen in many different ways including
text, web pages, CD/ROM or DVD, videos, and audio. Thus, information technology must
become one of the criteria recognized and assessed in promotion and tenure decision, and
performance reviews. Electronic modes of scholarly distribution must be considered serious and legitimate. Written electronic "publication" and scholarship should consider the
following criteria: 1. Electronic journals should clearly indicate whether they are peer-reviewed. 2. Digital publications should indicate their rate of manuscript acceptance. 3. Names of those on the editorial board of electronic journals should be readily
available. Authors should be encouraged to include all of the above information with the scholarly
material that they submit to their department for performance review and/or promotion and
tenure. While the number of purely electronic published outlets for scholarship in Political
Science is still small it should be clearly understood that the rigor with which textual
manuscripts and other electronic scholarly output is peer-reviewed can and should be equal
to the criteria traditionally applied to scholarship in our discipline. The medium or
media do not diminish the standards applied to the work that is presented for
dissemination to the discipline. When political scientists develop electronic material such as CD-ROMs or other digital
products, departments should invite the authors to suggest names of expert outside
evaluators who can assist the department in judging the nature and quality of the material
produced. Departments in evaluating prizes awarded to faculty for creative and scholarly
work in IT should, whenever appropriate, examine the assessment processes and awards
criteria used by sister disciplines, particularly in the humanities, to evaluate faculty
members engaged in "creative" work.
I am editor of the "Insights" Department of the Journal of
Policy Analysis and Management. If you have ideas for this Department, send me an e mail
about them. I am attaching below something I wrote recently for my inaugural issue that
describes the sort of contribution I am looking for. Eugene Bardach
Professor of Public Policy
Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy
University of California
2607 Hearst Street
Berkeley, CA 94720-7320
510-642-7422
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~gspp Eugene Bardach, Goldman School of Public Policy, UC Berkeley
Insights Dept Editor, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management From the Department Editor
Wishing to inaugurate my tenure as Insights Department editor with an inspirational
message to potential contributors, I sought my own inspiration in the writings of the
Founders. I cant improve on what the first Insights editor, James W. Vaupel, wrote
back in mid-1981. So here it is, only slightly excerpted: Many creative policy insights are lost for lack of a suitable forum. What
is needed is a place to publish when you have one brilliant, incisive, or iconoclastic
idea, captured with wit, verve, and precision. "INSIGHTS" is dedicated to
cultivating this stimulating but neglected genre.
These substantive,
methodological, or pedagogical articles could:
- propound a creative, partially baked policy idea
- challenge the direction of current policy with an "emperors new clothes" analysis
- push a few numbers around, as only the most talented analysts can, to clarify some murky issue
- share some crafty stratagem or wisdom from the firing line
- resurrect a luminous insight that has been neglected
- disseminate a policy that has worked elsewhere
- exploit a book as a sparring partner, foil, target, or launching pad
- distribute a paradigmatically sharp and refreshing memo
- illustrate some method of policy analysis or management by deftly dissecting a puzzling problem
- draw a constructive lesson from the unintended consequences of some policy or decision
Vaupel imposed a 2000-word maximum and proposed an average of 1500 words.
I wont officially change his numbers, but they seem high to me today. We are all
busier than in 1981. Please try to do the job more succinctly. Look for ways to tell your
story in a simple graph or a table with eight or ten numbers and readable headings.
Practitioners are particularly invited to try their hand at this. They have so many
interesting stories to tell. Academics do too, of course. In any case, we do not
discriminate on the basis of professional identification. Anyone who has a bright idea for
an Insight and wants a reaction is welcome to send me a short summary by e-mail: e2bar@uclink4.berkeley.edu.
Gary Hamel's New Mantra: InnovationGary Hamel is best known for co-authoring the best-selling book, "Competing for
the Future," which endeared him to corporate chieftains around the world. As a fan of
his work, I've read just about everything he's written. The gist of his message has been
that company leaders need to rethink how they do strategy. But in recent months, Hamel has been shifting more of his attention to what he calls
strategy innovation. Reason: e-commerce. "Somewhere out there is a bullet with your
company's name on it," he wrote in a cover piece in Fortune magazine.
"Competition today is not between products, it's between business models." In another journal, the Product Development Best Practices Report, Hamel continues the
argument. "I don't think product development practices and processes are the
principal issue. The big challenge most companies face today is how to innovate - how to
create business strategies and business models that generate new wealth. "Thirty or forty years ago, Deming came along with quality. At that time it was an
intensely radical idea. And it took many American companies twenty years to wake up to the
fact that ordinary employees have brains that can and should be engaged in quality
improvement. Now we take that for granted. "The issue today is innovation," says Hamel. "And where does innovative,
new-wealth creating strategy come from? Most people will tell you it comes from
visionaries like Gates or Grove. But that's not satisfactory. we need to get past the
common belief that innovation is supposed to be resident in R&D, or in the CEO and
senior vice presidents, who, as a group, have almost zero diversity in their outlook. You
have to encourage top management to give up their monopoly on strategy and setting
corporate direction and find ways to turn that task over to the entire organization." Other quotes from Hamel:
"You need a senior staff mature enough and open enough to be willing to tolerate an
ongoing corporate-wide conversation about innovation. Or you need some people who can
effectively organize a grass roots campaign. "You have people who see the writing on
the walls, people who see new opportunities. But there's no legitimate route where they
can be heard, where they can challenge the dominant logic of the organization."
Product Development Best Practices Report is published by the Management Roundtable. For
more information: http://www.ManagementRoundtable.com
More next week! Robert B. Tucker is president of The Innovation Resource, Santa Barbara, California.
He's author of MANAGING THE FUTURE: 10 Driving Forces of Change for the Next Century, and
other books on innovation, and is a popular speaker at conferences. (Innovationresource@compuserve.com) Innovation Network http://www.thinksmart.com
451 E. 58th Ave., #4625, Box 468 Phone: 303-308-1088
Denver, CO 80216 FAX: 303-295-6108
staff@thinksmart.com
Submitted by: Dorothy Milburn
"Information, Incentives and Commitment: An Empirical Analysis of Contracts between Government and State Enterprises"From: The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Vol. 14, No. 2,
Fall 1998 BY:
MARY SHIRLEY
World Bank, Development Economics Research Group
LIXIN XU
World Bank This article analyzes the experience with performance contracts between developing
country governments and the managers of their state-owned enterprises. It identifies how
problems of information asymmetry, incentives, and commitment can lead to shirking. It
applies this conceptual framework to a sample of 12 contracts with monopoly state
enterprises in 6 developing countries and finds that all suffer from serious contracting
problems and there is no pattern of improved performance that can be attributed to the
contracts.
The Knowledge Ecology Network (KEN) Last year [we established] the Knowledge Ecology Workgroup, a group of people coming
together to design KEN - the Knowledge Ecology Network (to refresh your memory, the URL
for the original KEW process is at: (http://www.KnowledgeEcology.com/kenf/) [The KEN is about] Knowledge Ecology and the formation of a vibrant community of
like-minded knowledge professionals. The KEWorkgroup continues their work, and are now
proud to announce the first draft of the KEN design, a place we are currently naming as
'KENPort.' We envision this community as a "town" in cyberspace, filled with people
attracted by the richness of tools, ideas and groundbreaking dialogue around the
principles, practices and models of Knowledge Ecology. It is designed as a place for
people who are convinced that an evolving organization will be knowledge-based, community
structured and driven by "entrepreneurial" intentions to contribute to society.
In short we want to organize a community that attracts people concerned for the ecology of
knowledge in organizations. We have put together a high-level description of KENport, that awaits a review by
knowledgeable potential members and leaders of the community, in short: by you. We are
looking for your input, positive or negative. We are asking for your ideas for
improvements and your critical appraisal of the overall approach. The KENPort proposal seeks to outline the various features which a visitor to KENPort
could experience, the opportunities for offering services within the KENPort enterprise /
community, the governance arrangements for this development, and a possible revenue model
for the development and operation of KENPort. It is intended to use the proposal as a
basis for seeking investment funding and for undertaking more detailed design. Before proceeding with more detailed design work, we have decided to seek additional
external review of the proposal, inviting some former members of the KEWorkgroup, as well
as a select number of others, experts in relevant fields. We are looking for your input,
positive or negative. We are asking for your ideas for improvements and your critical
appraisal of the overall approach. The proposal can be viewed at http://www.knowledgeecology.com/kenport/
We will be opening a special web based conference to receive feedback and questions
regarding the KENPort proposal. The duration of the proposal review conference is planned
to last for 3 weeks starting on May 28 and ending on June 18. If you are interested to
join in with other knowledge ecology enthusiasts to review the KENPort project, please
respond by signing the 'Review Panel Registration' form at http://www.KnowledgeEcology.com/kenport/registration.shtml
and we will send you instructions on how to access the conference. If you have any questions feel free to contact me directly. We look forward to your
contributing your wisdom in the creation of this exciting project.
Some interesting ideas on innovation At: www.syntrek.com and http://www.syntrek.com/eisen2.htm
Re-launch of Public Administration, an international quarterly Edited by Professor R. A. W. Rhodes Public Administration is a major refereed journal, founded in 1922, which publishes
articles on public administration, public policy and public management. Originally the
journal of the British Royal Institute of Public Administration, it became an independent
international journal in 1992. It has a global circulation. For 1999 the journal has been
relaunched with significantly increased coverage of European public administration in a
new 'European Forum'. AIMS The new journal has three objectives * To stimulate scholarly and practitioner dialogue in public administration, public
management and policy analysis.
* To encourage critical, comparative analysis, especially of European, Commonwealth and
American public administration.
* To publish articles which are theoretically rigorous and of a broad current interest. Public Administration has an eminent editorial board drawn from Austria, Belgium, the
Netherlands, France, Germany, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the USA. NEW 'EUROPEAN FORUM' This new section recognises the significant expansion, and international orientation,
of public administration in Western Europe; and it seeks to foster communication and
co-operation among this community of scholars. Although there are several national journals, few carry material on comparative public
administration or aspire to an international audience. This gap in journal coverage,
coupled with the quantity and quality of work available, has created the opportunity for a
significant expansion of Public Administration. For 1999, the journal will be increased to
1000 pages and European articles will account for up to 50 per cent of its content. EXPANDED REVIEW SECTION A substantially expanded 'Reviews' section will continue to provide traditional reviews
covering European as well as U.K. and U.S. publications.
It will also encourage 'state of the art' reviews of public administration in selected
countries. There will also be an important innovation: the review section will cover the
expanding field of electronic media, the worldwide web and CD-ROM publishing. MAIN ARTICLES The journal will continue to publish articles on public administration and public
policy in Britain and the rest of the world, especially the Commonwealth and USA, which
meet our stated aims. These will account for up to 50 per cent of the journal's contents. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND NOTES These sections provide an outlet for shorter articles which address issues of interest
to practitioners. Forthcoming Highlights include:
- Special Issue: Comparing Networks
edited by Peter Bogason and Theo Toonen
- Compulsion by Stealth: Lessons from the European Union on the Use of National Identity Cards, Adrian Beck and Kate Broadhurst
- Testing the Limits of Incrementalism, George Boyne
- The Impact of Bureaucratic Structure on Policy Making, Morton Egeberg
- Between Democracy and Efficiency: trends in local government reform in the Netherlands and Germany, Frank Hendriks
- Causes and Effects in Policy Change: the Brent Spar case, Grant Jordan
- The Public Sector Ethos is Dead, Long Live the Public Service Ethos, Mick Temple
- What Drives Machinery of Government Change? Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom 1950-1997, Patrick Willis and Glyn Davis
SUBMITTING ARTICLES The editors will welcome articles on any aspect of public administration which meet our
stated aims. Articles for the 'Main Articles' section and 'European Forum' should be
6-8,000 words long. Articles for 'Public Management' and the 'Review Articles' should be
4,000 words. 'Notes' should be no more than 2,000 words. Manuscripts for 'European Forum' should be
sent to:
Professor Walter Kickert,
Department of Public Administration,
Erasmus University, P.O. Box 1738,
3000 DR, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
ALL other manuscripts should be sent to:
Professor R.A.W. Rhodes,
Department of Politics,
University of Newcastle,
Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE1 7RU, U.K.
Authors should send 3 (three) copies of their manuscripts, typed, double spaced
(including all references and quotations) on A4 paper including a separate title page and
a 150-word abstract. The journal uses author-date references and does not print notes. A
style sheet is available from the Managing Editor. Contributions for the new 'European
Forum' are welcome now. All books for review should be sent to:
Professor Peter Bogason,
Department of Social Science,
Roskilde University,
P.O. Box 260, DK 4000,
Roskilde, Denmark.
ORDERING Personal rates * US$58.00 North America*
* =A335.00 Rest of World Reduced rates for members of national political science associations * US$50.00 North America*
* =A330.00 Rest of World Institutional rates * =A3193.00 Europe
* US$ 380.00 North America*
* =A3229.00 Rest of World To subscribe please e-mail: jnlinfo@blackwellpublishers.co.uk
or visit
http://www.blackwellpublishers.co.uk/asp/journal.asp?ref=3D0033-3298,
to order a sample copy e-mail gnelmes@blackwellpublishers.co.uk
including PADM - SAMPLE COPY in the address line and giving both your name and address and
that of your institutional librarian Source: PUMA News Forum
2000 Dubai Award: Call for Best PracticesThe Dubai International Award for Best Practices in Improving the Living Environment
(DIABP) recognizes initiatives which have made outstanding contributions to improving the
quality of life in cities and communities around the world. Each of the ten Awards
consists of a US$30,000 cash prize, a trophy and certificate. The Award is open to all
organizations from the public, private and civil society sectors. The deadline for
submissions is 31 March 2000. Substantive feedback will be provided to those that submit
early. For the complete submission guide in English, French or Spanish, please visit: http://www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/awards/
or contact: bestpractices@unchs.org 1999 Best Practices Database on CD-ROM A joint product of UNCHS (Habitat) and the Together Foundation, the 1999 Best Practices
database has been officially released on CD-ROM during the 17th session of the Commission
on Human Settlements on 7 May 1999. Over 650 good and best practices will be searchable by
subject, region, country, eco-system and keyword. The database is a valuable resource for
practicing professionals, decision- and policy-makers, researchers and the media. To purchase the CD-ROM version, please contact the Together Foundation at: info@together.org Furthermore this database is also available via the Internet at: http://www.bestpractices.org What's New - Women & Local Government, Ibaque, Colombia
- Banana Kelly, USA: Award-winning Update
- Chengdu, China, Best Practices Update
- World Conference on Model Cities, Statement by Dr. Toepfer
- Best Practices in Brazil: Annoucing The Caixa BP Award
For more information on the preceding, please visit our web site at: http://www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/news
Reference - Analysis of use of the Best Practices database May 1999
For more information on this reference, please visit our web site at: http://www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp/news
This information was published in the B E S T P R A C T I C E S N E W S L E T T E R The newsletter is published by the Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme (BLP)
of the United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) to inform and to stimulate
exchange between local authorities, civic organizations, policy makers, researchers and
urban practitioners for making our cities and communities more livable. Their Address: Best Practices and Local Leadership Programme UNCHS (Habitat), P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi,
Kenya Tel: (254-2) 624328, Fax: (254-2) 623080 e-mail: bestpractices@unchs.org The website of the Best Practices & Local Leadership Programme (BLP) may be visited
at: http://www.sustainabledevelopment.org/blp
Glossary of Concepts and Listserv "Globe-L" on GlobalizationPublic Administration in America is heavily influenced by globalization -- many
agencies confront international problems that affect their operations, and increasingly
transnational organizations develop policies and programs that impact Americans and affect
our domestic activities. A growing number of Americans are involved internationally in
projects that involve or affect the administrative practices of other countries. Yet there
is no clear agreement about what GLOBALIZATION is or how it works. Some see it as an
economic process in which multinational corporations and the uncontrolled movement of
capital are re-shaping the world. Others point to the increased movement of people, of
goods, of information and practices as crucially important. We can also think about how
some administrative functions have moved upwards to international organizations or
regimes, while others are moving downwards, not only to states in our federal system, but
also to autonomous nations, such as indigenous peoples. This means that inter-governmental
relations at all levels are becoming more complex and important. I have been working internationally and collaboratively to develop a mini-glossary of
concepts relating to globalization and if anyone in your section is writing or thinking
about this phenomenon and its implications, I'd like to invite them to join the project.
We have an international Listserv called "Globe-L" that anyone can join, and the
preliminary results of our work can be seen on my Web Site which has a segment for
globalization at: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/welcome.htm#global
To go directly to the summary, with color slides, of our preliminary findings, you can go
to: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/glonotes.htm
We plan to build on this foundation and cumulate our findings by adding whatever
material members of Globe-L contribute. You or any member of your section who writes to
tell me what they mean by "globalization" can join this list -- and leave it as
soon as they find it uninteresting. For your background information, consider that at last year's meeting of the American
Society for Public Administration (ASPA) conference in Seattle, our Section for
International and Comparative Administration (SICA) held a roundtable on the implications
of globalization for administrative development. I wrote a short note for this session
which you can find at: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/sica.htm
There you will also find links to notes written by other participants. We agreed that
this is an important theme with far-reaching implications for American public
administration as well as for development administration in other countries. Although the
Globe-L project was launched in conjunction with the International Sociological
Association, interested members of ASPA are welcome to participate. Would you be willing to help by identifying members of your section who are doing
research and writing on any administration questions that have global implications? You
could give me their names and e-mail addresses or, if you prefer, just forward this note
to them with a request that they contact me directly -- using e-mail only since I won't be
able to handle the project on slow mail. What I am asking for is a short text that either
by explicit definition or implicitly, in context, shows what someone has in mind when
speaking or writing about "globalization." The results of the ASPA portion of
this study will be made available to ASPA in general and SICA in particular, and
interested members will always be able to view and use the results by going to my Web
Page. I hope the results will help them write more effectively about links between
globalization and public administration. The techniques used in this project can also, of
course, be adapted for the clarification of other important but fuzzy terms, so this
exercise should also prove helpful for members not especially interested in globalization. I look forward to your response. With many thanks and much aloha, Fred FRED W. RIGGS, Professor Emeritus
Political Science Department, University of Hawaii
2424 Maile Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, U.S.A.
Phone: (808) 956-8123 Fax: (808) 956-6877
e-mail: FREDR@HAWAII.EDU
Web Page: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~fredr/ Century old slogan of the Cosmopolitan Clubs: ABOVE ALL NATIONS IS HUMANITY
A Report of the Special Parliamentary Committee for the Future, Part 2: Skill and Faira PlayAn Active and Responsible FinlandA broad-based discussion of the role and future of Finland this report addresses such
issues as values, work and unemployment, trouble spots in the social welfare system,
sustainable development and an government active stance and the governance of change. Available from:
Committee Counsellor Paula Tiihonen
The Finnish Parliament
FIN00102 Helsinki
Email: paula.tiihonen@eduskunta.fi
Internet: http://www.eduskunta.fi
Some intersting information from the Canadian Centre for Management Development found at http://www.ccmd-ccg.gc.ca/whatsNew.html
This is a short reply to the separate comments and questions posed by Hawks and Clarke
in Vol 6 # 20 ofthe Innovation Management Network. First to Mr. Clarke -- "Right on, Sir." The simple fact is that there is just
no substitute for having been there and done it, and the more often the better. Since
today's markets are chaotic, doing the same experiment does not necessarily yield the same
result. Useful art is more like quantum physics than bench science. Hence, though simulations
and case studies are helpful background knowledge, training for preprogrammed linear
responses is not very useful. The experimental stuff Senge does at MIT to build learning organizations is perhaps
more helpful, and learning in the real world is better yet. (My recent book "Engines
of Prosperity," Imperial College Press, 1998, discusses trends and suggests useful
templates for knowledge based business in today's markets.) For Mr. Hawks, yes, sorting by degrees of "newness" is indeed a useful way to
look at things. Chapter one of my 1990 book "High Tech with Low Risk" delves
into that. Figure one on page five gives a three by three matrix that sorts project
uncertainty (risk) along the market and technology axis. The so-called "suicide square" is when both the market and the technology are
new. It offers the highest risk-return. Conversely, when both the technology and the
market are "existing," the risk-return is the lowest. In the middle are
"extensional" markets and technologies. The different squares, of course, beg
for different approaches and strategies. Both books are available from Amazon.com. A sampling of useful readings and references
is posted on my web page. Abstracts and samples of talks are also posted. www.trudelgroup.com. from John D. Trudel
In the new product literature, the demarkations are:
(1) product extension (same base product with slight modifications; identical product
in a new segment)
(2) new platform product (net product from which product extensions are possible
(3) new-to-the-company products (NIH, but imported to the company who is now going to
product it for the first time)
(4) new-to-the-world (never been done before; no market exists)
From:
Innovation Management Network, Volume 6, Number 22 (March 30, 1999) WEB PAGE IS: http://www.mcmaster.ca/
THE TIM WEB PAGE ADDRESS IS: http://www.aom.pace.edu/tim/
The European Journal of Innovation Management fills in a very important gap in
representing the phenomenon of innovation in a modern context and in covering all the
different aspects the management of innovation should address. EJIM takes a
holistic approach rather than the narrow technical focus adopted by many publications. It
presents innovation management as an all-encompassing integrated process, demonstrating
the role of specific areas and also the various linkages. This information resource is
packed with a wide range of discussion papers, case studies, and reports on new
breakthroughs and the philosophy behind the theory and the practice of continuous
improvement in innovation. In addition, it regularly brings you Internet editorials, book
reviews, reports from key conferences and an events calendar to keep you firmly up to date
with everything that is happening in the field. Editor: Professor Mohammed Zairi, SABIC Chair of Best Practice Management, University
of Bradford, England Deputy Editor: Perviaz K Ahmed, Unilever Lecturer in Innovation
Management, University of Bradford, England Contents of Volume 2, Number 1, 1999
* Editorial - Strategy in innovation
* "Successful market innovation" by Axel Johne
* "TQM and business innovation" by A Martines Lorente, F Dewhurst and B Dale
* "The effectiveness of market nformation in enhanicng new product success
rates" by Shart, N Tzokas and M Saren
* "Benchmarking for brand innovation" by P k Ahmed and M Zairi Further details
Website: http://www.mcb.co.uk/ejim.htm Contact: cnewsome@mcb.co.uk From:
Innovation Management Network, Volume 6, Number 22 (March 30, 1999) WEB PAGE IS: http://www.mcmaster.ca/
THE TIM WEB PAGE ADDRESS IS: http://www.aom.pace.edu/tim/
Volkswagen Foundation - Transformation of Economic/Political/Social SystemsFunding Available http://www.volkswagen-stiftung.de/english/merkblat/merktran.htm Support for theoretical and empirical research into the coincidence and interaction of
economic and political transitions and the linkages between them, alterations in the
administrative, legal and social spheres, and in international relations. Academic
institutions from all over the world are eligible. Closing date: 21 March, 1999
Some websites which deal with the environment and with the environmental aspects of the
economy can be found in the Innovation Journal Library. You
may find them interesting, and often informative, although their quality varies with their
competence and the vested interests involved. P.S. I'm constantly hungry for more good sites on this subject, so everybody feel free
to send their favourites to me! Sandy Bryce
adbryce@magma.ca
Announcing the Launch of a New Journal FORESIGHT: the journal of futures studies, strategic thinking and policy. FORESIGHT is a new international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the study of
the future. Edited by Colin Blackman, former editor of Futures, and supported by an
editorial board of prominent individuals, FORESIGHT is aimed at an academic, business and
policy making audience. It will be an important vehicle for the publication of research, business analysis and
policy thinking. FORESIGHT will provide a much needed forum for debate on the important
social, economic, political, technological and environmental issues which are shaping all
our futures. It is intended to be a valuable resource for those in business, organizations
and government, providing a long-term perspective to better inform decisions and actions. FORESIGHT will be launched in February 1999 and will be published six times a year.
Each issue will contain peer reviewed articles as well as opinion pieces and essays from
leading academic and business thinkers, and a reviews section (including book reviews,
conference reports, letters to the editor, communications on research in progress, a
calendar of events and other regular journal features). The first issue includes articles
on, for instance, the inevitability of a business model for education, the role of the
military in non-war operations, the need to rethink time and leisure, using scenarios to
plan the future of health services, and the internet and globalization of culture. FORESIGHT will be available in hard copy and online to subscribers.
For further details: http://www.camfordpublishing.com
Colin Blackman
Claremont Graduate University
The Peter F. Drucker Archives The Board of Advisors of the Peter F. Drucker Archives seeks to entertain proposals
that will result in a commission for the development of one or more courses that, in
design and content, perpetuate the thinking and teaching of Peter Drucker. These courses will be the foundation of a program of development of a library of
concepts related to DruckerAEs idea as well as a content library of learning-focused
materials designed to communicate the concepts. The proposed course(s) shall:
- draw on materials in the Drucker Archives and other resources
- provide content for at least 24 contact hours
- target one of the following audiences; graduate management students, mid-level executives, leaders in non-profit organizations
- have clearly defined outcome and measurement components
- be adaptable to other audiences.
The Board welcomes letters of interest, accompanied by current vitae of the proposal
author(s), by January 12, 1999. On the basis of the letters of interest, The Board will grant several grants of
$5,000-$10,000 for the development of commission proposal packages for its consideration. Commission proposals should include the following:
- 15-20 page paper summarizing the underlying elements of the proposed course,
- Preliminary syllabus outline, including media integration
- Proposed budget and timeline
The Board will select one or more proposals for development into a full course to be
packaged and promoted by the Drucker Archives. Papers written as part of the commission proposal process will be considered for
inclusion in a compilation to be delivered and published in conjunction with the
celebration of Professor DruckerAEs 90th birthday in November 1999. The completed course
package will be required at the same time. Those receiving commissions to develop course materials will be granted full access to
the Drucker Archives, including stipends for travel. The Drucker Archives will also
provide other types of support necessary to complete a project of this nature. Materials submitted as part of the commission proposal packages will become the
property of the Drucker Archives. For more information contact Eric Pollard at (909) 607-7359 or eric.pollard@cgu.edu Eric Pollard, Director, The Drucker Archives
Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management
Claremont Graduate University
1021 N. Dartmouth Avenue, Claremont, California 91711
(909) 607-7359, Fax (909) 607-7359, Eric.Pollard@cgu.edu
Global Knowledge Innovation Infrastructure (GKII):The Banff Center announced the launch of a Global Knowledge Innovation Infrastructure (GKII) the week of December 1, 1998 in Calgary, Canada.Innovation and Sensible Risk Taking in the Public Sector: In his Report of December 1,
1998, the Auditor General of Canada announced release of a report on proceedings of a
roundtable discussion on innovation and sensible risk taking in the public sector. The
roundtable included senior managers from federal and provincial governments, political
representatives, and representatives from private sector and labour organizations. Intellectual Capital:
Conferences and links: GOTOBUTTON BM_1_
http://www.business.mcmaster.ca/mktg/nbontis/ic/#LIN
Articles: GOTOBUTTON BM_2_
http://www.business.mcmaster.ca/mktg/nbontis/ic/#REF
Researchers: http://www.business.mcmaster.ca/mktg/nbontis/ic/#RES
Articles:http://www.business.mcmaster.ca/mktg/nbontis/ic/#REF Researchers: http://www.business.mcmaster.ca/mktg/nbontis/ic/#RES
CLAD4s Document On-Line: A New Public Management for Latin America Latin American Centre for Development Administration (CLAD) - invites all communities
interested in the public sector to see the document: A New Public Management for Latin
America. This document was written by CLAD's Scientific Council and approved by CLAD's Directive
Council at its October 14th, 1998 meeting (Madrid, Spain). This Council is made up of the
highest governmental authorities responsible for the modernization of Public
Administration and State reform, among its twenty-five member states. You can find it at the following address: http://www.clad.org.ve/gespub.html
Spanish and Portugese versions are also available there.
Sincerely, Marianela Nuqez Barboza CEDAI - CLAD NOTICLAD No. 8 "The fact that in the institutional action of CLAD, the International Congress is
the main work programme can be explained by the wide and qualified call at the regional
and extra regional level, as well as for the ability to foster debate and exchange of
learning on the various ambits related to public matters and performance of managing
institutions. For this reason, this issue of NOTICLAD (No. 8) underscores the most
significant aspects arising out of the III Congress recently held. "The I Ibero-American Conference of Ministers of Public Administration and State
Reform -the results of which are submitted here- is another relevant initiative of CLAD.
This Conference approved the Lisbon Declaration, which was endorsed in turn by the VIII
Summit of Heads of State and Government. Also, the XXVIII Regular Meeting of the Directive
Council of CLAD was held in Madrid. The agreements of this meeting, underscored by
NOTICLAD, include upcoming international sittings, the creation of work groups, and the
endorsement of a constitutional document -A New Public Management for Latin America." For more details, visit CLAD's Web Site (http://www.clad.org.ve), where you could find
the electronic version of NOTICLAD No. 8 (http://www.clad.org.ve/noti8i.html),
and an extended vision of our services (printed and on-line). CLAD Rankings: Rankings of Journals of Managing Innovation and New Technology http://mint.mcmaster.ca/mint/readings/index.htm From: colin.talbot@publicfutures.com
Dear colleagues, As you know, work has been going on in the UK on developing a "Public Service
Excellence Model". The aim has been to develop a specifically public sector
performance benchmarking and assessment tool. The Model was developed by Prof. Colin Talbot of the University of Glamorgan in the UK. We have now completed a survey in the UK in which nearly 100 organisations
participated, each doing a self-assessment against the Model of their own performance.
These include central government agencies, local government, health bodies, police,
probation, fire and other services. Feedback on the Model, and the detailed assessment criteria, has been very positive. Two organisations have also very creatively now used the basic framework of the Model
for "business planning" purposes. A number of documents outlining the Model are currently available. If you would like information please specify which documents you
would like.
Another report has just been released today by the (Ottawa based) Canadian Policy
Research Network which talks about communities from the aspect of cohesion- apparently
based on a Club of Rome study. It looks at local communities and the "whole
society" from five dimensions:
- belonging
- inclusion
- involvement
- recognition
- legitimacy
The report (which is all Canadian) cites work by the Canadian Human Rights Commission
and Environment Canada's approaches (to environmental citizenship) among others. Here's an extract from their email announcement today:
Canadian Policy Research Networks is pleased to announce the release of "Mapping
Social Cohesion: The State of Canadian Research," by Jane Jenson. The Study as well
as a Backgrounder and Press Release are available for complete download from our website
at http://www.cprn.org (L'étude est aussi
disponible en français).
I would recommend reading the full report. Bill Pugsley (613) 731-0145 President, Canadian Meteorological & Oceanographic Society
Président, Société canadienne de météorologie et d'océanographie http://www.meds.dfo.ca/cmos/
E-Mail: PUGSLEY@FREENET.CARLETON.CA
(checked daily)
(back-up) BPUGSLEY@COMPUSERVE.COM (checked
weekly) A related report has also been published by the CPRN, Securing the Social Union,
by Kathy O'Hara. This study reports on the results of a series of roundtable discussions
held last year by CPRN with federal and provincial officials, academics, and experts from
non governmental organizations. These roundtables discussions considered the definition of
the social union, including its purpose, values and principles. They also looked at how
outcomes in the social union could be measured, what new institutions are required to
carry out the functions of the social union, and how citizens could become engaged in the
construction of the social union. Details at: Editor, Innovation Journal IPMN WorkshopThe Planning Committee for the 1999 IPMN Workshop in Siena, Italy is now soliciting
proposals for participation in the Workshop that will meet July 28-30, 1999. Priority for
Workshop participation is given to members of the IPMJ editorial board as a matter of IPMN
policy. However, the Planning Committee is intereted in reviewing proposals from IPMN
members for participation as presenters or discussants. Participation in IPMN Workshops
will be limited, as has been the case in the past, to approximately 25 persons. Four paper
presentations will be made in the two day workshop so as to permit in depth reflection and
discussion among participants. The Workshop theme selected by the IPMN Policy Steering
Committee is, "Assessing Alternative Research Methodologies in Public
Management." Please send proposals for participation to our Siena host, Professor
Riccardo Mussari at mussari mussari@unisi.it with
copies to L. R. Jones at and to Professor Kuno Schedler, IPMN Coordinator, at Kuno.Schedler@unisg.ch and to Professor Fred
Thompson, IPMJ Editor at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/bpugsley
The program for the Workshop should be completed by the end of January 1999. Also, think about participating in some way at the next IPMN Conference in Sydney in
the spring of 2000.
Y2K is on the way.
- available at: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rma/dpr/97-98/9798dpre.html
The Impact of the Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyHave a look at MIT: The Impact of Innovation concerning the impact the MIT graduates
have had on the USA economy at: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/founders/
Paula Tiihonen just finished her 1½ year job working on the Report on Finland´s Future. 100 pages on future options - about values, work, welfare models, the information
society - have been decided in our Committee for the Future in the Parliament. On
Wednesday the Report was in plenary in the Parliament and it was accepted.
It will be translated in English. Two innovations were created: 1) The Report of the Committee for the Future was handled in plenary- in a session of
200 MPs in assembly - totally on the Internet. The whole discussion was delivered by voice
and by picture on Internet. You could have looked (at) it- in Finnish. It was the first
time in the history of Internet and in the history of parliaments in the whole world you
could follow an official assembly by Internet.
If you go to the web-site of the Finnish Parliament (www.eduskunta.fi)
you can see our committee´s reports and also multi-videos, etc . The Assembly discussion
will also be there for 2-3 months. 2) It was the first time when the collection of innovative ideas for politics got
results - a decision of Parliament on the initiative of politicians. In the Report there
are 28 concrete statements for government - these statements will also become a basic
document for the election and a basis for negotiations and for the program of a new
government (elections in May).
The Department of Public Administration, National University of Ireland, Cork, is to
conduct two Virtual Symposia on the following themes: 1. Public Administration in Ireland 2. Public Administration in Europe The proceedings of each symposium is to be published in two special editions of Public
Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal. The intention of the special editions is to present as comprehensive a picture as
possible of the current state of, and issues in, Public Administration in Ireland and
Europe. Therefore, papers in all areas of the discipline are being solicited. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal is a
peer-reviewed, academic publication. However, this should not discourage those from a
non-academic background who are active in Public Administration from submitting articles
in their area of expertise. The dead-line for the submission of abstracts of proposed papers was December 15, 1998.
These should be of 300 words or less and include three key words. These should be
submitted by post to: The Virtual Symposia Committee
The Department of Public Administration,
National University of Ireland,
Cork. They may also be submitted by fax to: 353/21/903135; or via e-mail to: p.burke@ucc
Please state clearly in which symposium you are interested. Those wishing to review the journal may do so at: http://www.hbg.psu.edu/Faculty/jxr11/index.html.
Questions or comments may be addressed to Patrick Gerard Burke using the above contact
information or by telephone at 353/21/902087.
http://www.cmec.ca/stats/indicators.stm Education expenditures
Within Canada, the amount of funding available for education and the method of funding
vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Among the factors that contribute to the wide
variety of relative education expenditures are the size of the population, participation
rates, taxation resources and levels, and local priorities for education. Various levels
of government spent a total of about $56 billion in real dollars on education and training
in 1993-94, up from approximately
$45 billion in 1989-90, an increase of over 24%. While the share of funds spent by trade/vocation-al institutes, colleges, and
universities remained fairly stable between 1989-90 and 1993-94, the share spent on
elementary and secondary education increased over the same five-year period, accounting
for much of the overall growth in expenditures. Among the G-7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and the
United States), Canada recorded the highest level of public investment in all levels of
education relative to the economy. Canada's expenditure per student as a percentage of
gross domestic product per capita was about 32% in 1990-91. The United States, at
nearly 30%, had the second-highest rate, and Japan, at about 23%, had the lowest rate for
those G-7 countries that reported this information. Generally, education and health are the two largest sectors of expenditure in provinces
and territories, together accounting for 41.6% of over-all expenditures in 1993-94. The
percentage of overall funds allotted to education and health fell by less than 1% between
1988-89 and 1992-93, while the amount allocated to social services increased by nearly 2%
over the same period, and the amount set aside for servicing the debt increased by 1%.
1996 PCEIP
Learn from the best examples in federal, provincial and municipal government in
Ontario. Charge for the seminars, exhibits are free June 16 and 17, 1998 8am to 5pm each day
Joseph Shepard Bldg. 4900 Yonge St. North York
More information: www.psqf.org
1-800-263-3538
Prof. Colin Talbot
For those interested, a new model for the public sector - the Public Services
Excellence Model - is being developed by myself and colleagues in the UK.
The model has 14 categories broken down into 3 sections:
- Enablers
- Organisational Results
- Programme results
Beneath each category there are between 4/8 criteria - 82 in all - which can be used
for organisational measurement.
The model has been developed as a synthesis of existing theory and practice and is about
to be tested in the field through a survey of about 3,000 chief executive/director level
public managers in the UK.
The model is also being linked to a software application which allows it's use both as a
'one-off' or annual benchmarking tool and also as an in-year management tool. The software
allows users to build their own measures alongside the benchmarking criteria, thus
allowing both generalisability and specificity in the same framework. Anyone wanting to
know more, please email me. public-admin-and-management-request@mailbase.ac.uk Quality Road
"Bronte.Earl@health.gov.au" wrote about their first steps towards a quality
management. I am not sure if I repeat things, but did you know that there is a great
quality research movement going on in continental Europe?
Good institutions to contact would be:
* European Foundation for Quality Management, Brussels
* European Institute for Public Administration, Brussels
* Speyer Postgraduate School for Public Administration, Speyer (Germany)
* OECD, Paris (ask for Elke Loeffler) All the addresses can be found on the Web. Kuno Schedler
University of St. Gallen
Switzerland
Call for Papers --- Special Issue --- Beyond Sociotechnical SystemsThe Journal of Engineering and Technology Management is pleased to
announce a call for papers for a special issue addressing sociotechnical systems. Terri
Griffith (Washington University, St. Louis) and Deborah Dougherty (Rutgers University)
will serve as guest editors. Since the 1950s researchers have acknowledged that technical and social
factors interact to influence organizational outcomes. Work prior to the 50s (and even
some work today) often argued for technological determinism where technology
implementations were expected to have direct effects -- for example, if a robotic welding
system is introduced on an assembly-line, production throughput will increase. One of the first counters to the deterministic approach was made by Trist
and Bamforth1. They noted that human and organizational outcomes could only be understood
when social, psychological, environmental, and technological systems are assessed as a
whole. This approach has come to be known as a sociotechnical systems (STS)
perspective. This perspective assumes that organizations are "made up of people (the
social system) using tools, techniques and knowledge (the technical system) to produce
goods or services valued by customers (who are part of the organization's external
environment). How well the social and technical systems are designed with respect to
one another and with respect to the demands of the external environment determines to a
large extent how effective the organization will be"2, p.1. Research building from STS continues through today. A 1997 issue of Human
Relations 3 focuses on organization innovation and STS as a work design process (i.e., to
be compared with reengineering). Spender4 uses the ideas of social construction and STS to
discuss a knowledge theory of the firm. He notes that STS "is unsuitable as the basis
for a theory of the firm because it adopt[s] too naive a view of social systems and
ignor[es] economic interactions" (p.55). By contrasting Spender's comment with that of prior STS researchers it is
possible to see that the concept of STS is being used in two different ways. Much STS work
focuses on designing work for both organizational and human good. There is a normative
slant in that the work suggests people should be involved in designing the relationships
between technology and work. Quality of work life is a key consideration. The other
perspective on STS is more theoretical. STS provides critical insights to understanding
the relationships between people, technology, and organizational outcomes. It is this
perspective that Spender (and others) have indicated is a limited, but interesting,
approach to understanding organizational outcomes. This special issue is the next step in this dialog. Trist and his
colleagues took the first step by opening the black box that was technology in the 50s.
Since then, technology researchers have explored a number of connections that might fit
into a general socio-tech view:
- the interactions of individual cognition and technology use, as with email systems the relationships between social roles and networks and technology adoption
- the cycles of technology problem solving and types of technical problems
- the spirals of adaptation between organization and technology in manufacturing innovation
- the co-evolution of social values and technological systems.
Others have developed tools and techniques designed to enable the linkage
of technologies across, or through people, such as concurrent engineering, design for
manufacturing, and CAD/CAM systems. With this explosion of STS-like work in technology management, at all
different levels of analysis and focused on such a variety of
problems, we think it is time to explore the theory that they may, or may not, have in
common. Do any or all of these relationships embody similar or different dynamics? Can we
build a broad sociotechnical theory that explains the linkages at so many levels and/or
technology problems, or are there different kinds of sociotechnical connections that
require different theories? Or that fit different kinds of technology management issues?
Perhaps a comprehensive theory is not possible -- that instead only subsets of levels,
problems, and other dimensions should be considered. Alternatively, future work may find
that a comprehensive theory is possible and provides a new approach to our understanding. To summarize, the goal of this special issue is twofold. The special issue
will present papers that go beyond STS as a rather vague description to develop more
explanatory theories of technology-organizational outcomes. These papers would clearly
explicate the what (what factors), how (how are the factors related), and why (why do
these dynamics exist). It is expected that the description, "Sociotechnical
Systems," will not be adequate for the new conceptualizations. The special issue will
also present empirical papers if they advance our understanding of STS as a theory, rather
than just an approach. Thus, empirical papers must include a cogent and comprehensive
description of their definition of, or contribution to, STS theory. Submissions might address (but are not limited to) the following:
- sociotechnical theory of the firm
- the dynamics of cognition and sociotechnical effects
- sociotechnical approaches to managing organizational knowledge
- other names for sociotechnical systems
- development and comparison of micro and macro sociotechnical theories
- assessment of the need for sociotechnical approaches
- the role of sociotechnical systems given a hypercompetitive environment
- culture's consequences for sociotechnical systems
- sociotechnical systems are dead, long live sociotechnical systems
The guest editors of this special issue represent different paradigms and
levels of analysis. This is seen as a benefit in expanding the approaches taken to this
topic. Authors should submit six copies of their manuscript to the editor they perceive as
being most appropriate for the work. Papers should be prepared in accordance with the
JET-M "Guide for Authors" (available in the first issue of each volume).
Papers must be received by the appropriate editor no later than April 1, 1999. All
submissions will be reviewed according to the JET-M standard double-blind review process. Terri L. Griffith
One Brookings Dr.
Campus Box 1133
Washington University
St. Louis, MO 63141
griffith@wuolin.wustl.edu
314/935-6394 (voice)
314/935-6359 (fax) Deborah J. Dougherty
Rutgers University Faculty of Management
81 New Street
Newark, NJ 07102-1820
doughert@everest.rugers.edu
732-873-0057 (voice) 1Trist, E.L., and K.W. Bamforth, "Some Social and Psychological
Consequences of the Long-Wall Method of Coal-Getting," Human Relations, 4 (1951):
3-38.
2Pasmore, W.A., Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems
Perspective, (New York, NY: John Wiley, 1988).
3Mathews, J.A., "Introduction to the Special Issue," Human Relations 50 (1997):
487-496. 4Spender, J.C., "Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the
Firm," Strategic Management Journal 17, Winter (1996): 45-62. From Volume 5, Number 76 (September 18, 1998) of Innovative Management
Network THE MINT WEB PAGE IS: http://mint.mcmaster.ca/
THE "TIM" WEB PAGE ADDRESS IS: http://www.aom.pace.edu/tim/
42nd Annual Meeting Friday-Saturday, April 16-17, 1999 Cornhusker Hotel,
Lincoln, Nebraska
If you consider yourself to be a futurist, please complete and return this form as soon as possible. Please send copies of this form to other futurists known to you.
Thank you. The Directory of Canadian Futurists will be printed as a small booklet. It will
include Canadians from every sector who are paid, full time or even only occasionally, to
undertake one or more forms of serious future-oriented activity, e.g. give a speech or
strategic briefing or undertake scanning, forecasting, scenario creation, search
conferences or futures research. The Directory is being produced by Square One Management Ltd. under contract from the
Policy Research Secretariat, Ottawa. It is intended as a service to all persons who have
need
to make contact with Canadian futurists. When it is published in the fall of 1998, there will be a small
charge for the Directory. All participants in this survey will be offered a discount on
the Directory.
An International Conference 26-27 March 1999 Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario
Canada Description of the problem: The Big Questions:
- What is the link between budget deficits and economic performance?
- Do you think big deficits cause recessions?
- Are balanced budgets the answer to our economic woes?
- What has caused the rise in debt-to-GDP ratios and how should we deal with this issue?
- What are the economic and social consequences of policies seeking to balance budgets?
- Has globalization reduced governments' potency to effectively deal with issues of unemployment, income distribution and social quality?
- Have Keynesian policies failed? And if so what is the alternative?
- Is this the beginning of the end of the Welfare State?
All these questions, and many more, will be answered at the conference by
a panel of leading experts in the fields of Government Finance, the Welfare State, and the
Labour
Market. Planning of the conference: The call for papers to be presented at the conference has been mailed out
to several institutions around the world. Personal invitations have been sent to some
prominent economists who have already confirmed their willingness to participate in the
conference. The deadline for submitting proposals is
30 September 1998. A preliminary programme of the conference is expected to be out in early
October 1998. The deadline for submitting completed papers is 15 February 1999. The
actual conference will take place on 26-27 March 1999. April 1999 the preparation of the manuscript for publication starts. If
the refereeing process is efficient and the manuscript is submitted in the form of high
quality laser printed, camera-ready copy the Publisher promises that the book will be
published by Fall 1999. If you would like to participate in this exciting event, please send me an
abstract of your paper as soon as possible and I will add your name to the list of
participants. For more information, http://www.economics.laurentian.ca/bougrine/conference.htm Updated 06/05/03
|